Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

A systematic review of the effect of infrastructural interventions to promote cycling: strengthening causal inference from observational data.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • بيانات النشر:
      Springer Science and Business Media LLC
      //dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-019-0850-1
      Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act
    • الموضوع:
      2019
    • Collection:
      Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      BACKGROUND: Previous reviews have suggested that infrastructural interventions can be effective in promoting cycling. Given inherent methodological complexities in the evaluation of such changes, it is important to understand whether study results obtained depend on the study design and methods used, and to describe the implications of the methods used for causality. The aims of this systematic review were to summarize the effects obtained in studies that used a wide range of study designs to assess the effects of infrastructural interventions on cycling and physical activity, and whether the effects varied by study design, data collection methods, or statistical approaches. METHODS: Six databases were searched for studies that evaluated infrastructural interventions to promote cycling in adult populations, such as the opening of cycling lanes, or the expansion of a city-wide cycling network. Controlled and uncontrolled studies that presented data before and after the intervention were included. No language or date restrictions were applied. Data was extracted for any outcome presented (e.g. bikes counted on the new infrastructure, making a bike trip, cycling frequency, cycling duration), and for any purpose of cycling (e.g. total cycling, recreational cycling, cycling for commuting). Data for physical activity outcomes and equity effects was extracted, and quality assessment was conducted following previous methodologies and the UK Medical Research Council guidance on natural experiments. The PROGRESS-Plus framework was used to describe the impact on subgroups of the population. Studies were categorized by outcome, i.e. changes in cycling behavior, or usage of the cycling infrastructure. The relative change was calculated to derive a common outcome across various metrics and cycling purposes. The median relative change was presented to evaluate whether effects differed by methodological aspects. RESULTS: The review included 31 studies and all were conducted within urban areas in high-income countries. Most of ...
    • File Description:
      Electronic; application/pdf; application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
    • Relation:
      https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/298231
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.17863/CAM.45283
    • Rights:
      Attribution 4.0 International ; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    • الرقم المعرف:
      edsbas.876F9769