Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Identity and the Hegemony of Universal Human Rights

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • بيانات النشر:
      Mofid University
    • الموضوع:
      2017
    • Collection:
      Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      Human rights are commonly portrayed as a narrative that passes through several chapters before reaching its inevitable conclusion. This narrative begins with the horror of Nazism, moves to the centrality of human rights in the UN Charter, eulogizes the Universal Declaration, celebrates the achievements of standard setting as set out in the major covenants, offers detailed analysis of methods of monitoring and, finally, speculates on the future of compliance. This narrative is sustained, firstly, by ‘naturalist’ foundationalism and, secondly, by a widely held assumptions about the move towards ‘settled norms’ in the contemporary world order. Although some pessimism is voiced over continued reports of torture, genocide, structural economic deprivation, disappearances, ethnic cleansing, political prisoners, the suppression of trade union rights, gender inequality, religious persecution, and many other violations of internationally agreed human rights, most commentators and activists tacitly adopt an optimistic stance that envisages a future rights based international order. The still prevalent naturalist account of human rights, together with a narrative that boasts ‘settled norms’, suggests that the human rights regime represents a final ‘truth’ about the essential nature of all humankind; a common identity that describes the individual in an increasingly globalized world. This paper interrogates the ‘naturalist-settled norm’ account of human rights from the perspective of power and knowledge. It begins by distinguishing between the international human rights regime and the global discourse of human rights. The former adopts a legal approach, where the neutral, value-free, unbiased and impartial nature of the law is tacitly accepted. The latter refers to human rights as social, political and economic practice, and must therefore include an account of power. From this perspective, the discourse of human rights might be said to ascribe a particular identity to human beings as agents of a particular type and kind, ...
    • ISSN:
      2423-6489
      2538-6360
    • Relation:
      http://humanrights.mofidu.ac.ir/article_29849_30dbae9cc72792ffefc1d8b7445b6358.pdf; https://doaj.org/toc/2423-6489; https://doaj.org/toc/2538-6360; https://doaj.org/article/52ced4c086384974b57969d5f07b0f34
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.22096/HR.2016.29849
    • الرقم المعرف:
      edsbas.874E6AC1