Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Is paediatric endotracheal suctioning by nurses’ evidence based? An international survey

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • بيانات النشر:
      Wiley
    • الموضوع:
      2021
    • Collection:
      University of Salford Institutional Repository
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      Background: Endotracheal suction (ETS) is essential in intubated patients to prevent tube occlusion and is one of the most common nursing interventions performed in intensive care. Aim: To explore how paediatric endotracheal suctioning (ETS) practices reflect Evidence-based Practice (EBP) recommendations in Paediatric intensive care units (PICU) worldwide. Study design and methods: A cross-sectional electronic survey linked to a real patient suction episode. Nurses completed the survey following a recent ETS episode. EBP was defined based on four of the American Association for Respiratory Care (AARC) best evidence recommendations: pre-oxygenation before suction, use of a suction catheter no more than half the diameter of the tracheal tube, shallow depth of suction and the continuous suction applied upon withdrawal of the catheter. Participants included PICU nurses who performed ETS in children (0-17 years) excluding preterm neonates. Results: Four hundred and forty-six complete surveys were received from 20 countries. Most nurses (80%, 367/446) reported that their unit had local guidelines for ETS. The most common reason for suctioning (44%) was audible/visible secretions. Over half of ETS episodes (57%) used closed suction. When exploring the individual components of suction, 63% (282/446) of nurses pre-oxygenated their patient prior to suction, 71% (319/446) suctioned no further than 0.5cm past end of the endotracheal tube, 59% (261/446) used a catheter no more than half the diameter of the endotracheal tube and 78% (348/446) used continuous negative pressure. 24% of nurses gave patients an additional bolus of sedative, analgesic and/or muscle-relaxant medication prior to suction; this decision was not related to the child’s history of instability with suction, as there was no significant difference in those who reported patients had a history of being unstable with suction (p=0.80). 26% (117/446) of nurses complied with all four EBP components in the reported suctioning episode. Conclusions: Considerable ...
    • File Description:
      application/pdf; application/msword
    • Relation:
      http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/60102/10/nicc.12644.pdf; http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/60102/3/accepted%20word%20version%20PERSIST%20study%20paper.pdf; http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/60102/1/accepted%20word%20version%20PERSIST%20study%20paper.docx; Rad, L orcid:0000-0002-2547-8209 , Carter, B, Curley, MCQ, Copnell, B and Tume, LN orcid:0000-0002-2547-8209 2021, 'Is paediatric endotracheal suctioning by nurses’ evidence based? An international survey' , Nursing in Critical Care, 26 (5) , pp. 372-379.
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.1111/nicc.12644
    • الدخول الالكتروني :
      http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/60102/
      http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/60102/10/nicc.12644.pdf
      http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/60102/3/accepted%20word%20version%20PERSIST%20study%20paper.pdf
      http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/60102/1/accepted%20word%20version%20PERSIST%20study%20paper.docx
      https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.12644
    • Rights:
      cc_by_4_0 ; http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/60102/10/nicc.12644.pdf:public ; http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/60102/3/accepted%20word%20version%20PERSIST%20study%20paper.pdf:staffonly ; http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/60102/1/accepted%20word%20version%20PERSIST%20study%20paper.docx:staffonly
    • الرقم المعرف:
      edsbas.87297382