نبذة مختصرة : Ideology studies have undergone considerable transformation over the past thirty years. New methodologies and approaches have recast the insights and interpretations it can deliver and that have established it as a major type of political thinking. More recently, however, the production and dissemination of ideologies have adopted novel forms that present a challenge even to the latest manifestations of thinking politically among groups and societies. They demand a reassessment of effective ways of understanding ideologies, especially under conditions of broad but fragmented articulation and circulation. Ideologies are now in pieces, dismantled, fractured, sporadic, discontinuous, even scavenged. The article discusses six trends in the mutation of their contents and patterns: deintellectualization, the brevity of transmitted messages, the democracy-challenging super-atomization of voices in the public domain, the increasing speed of change, the easy transfer of ideas across conventional boundaries, and a subtle opacity, often unintentionally concealed from producers and consumers alike. Their study can benefit from combining the investigation of the durable features of conceptual morphology with a sharp eye for the fluid and shifting cultural currents within which that morphology is filtered. ; Los estudios sobre ideología han sufrido una transformación considerable en los últimos treinta años. Nuevas metodologías y aproximaciones han moldeado las percepciones e interpretaciones que puede formular y que la han situado como una categoría principal del pensamiento político. Más recientemente, sin embargo, la producción y la difusión de ideologías han adoptado formas novedosas que suponen un desafío incluso a las últimas manifestaciones del pensamiento político entre grupos y sociedades. Demandan un replanteamiento de las formas efectivas de comprensión de las ideologías, especialmente bajo condiciones de articulación y circulación amplias, pero fragmentadas. Las ideologías están ahora hechas pedazos, ...
Relation: https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/HPOL/article/view/93170/4564456567863; https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/HPOL/article/view/93170/4564456567864; https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/HPOL/article/view/93170/4564456567866; Basevic, J. (2020). There’s no such thing as just «following the science»—coronavirus advice is political. Guardian, 28-4-2020. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812507. Conan Doyle, A. (1894). The adventure of Silver Blaze. The memoirs of Sherlock Holmes. London: George Newnes. Freeden, M. (1996). Ideologies and political theory: A conceptual approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Conan Doyle, A(2013). The political theory of political thinking: The anatomy of a practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Conan Doyle, A(2015). Liberalism: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Conan Doyle, A(2018). British liberalism in search of ideological recalibration. In H. Schattle and J. Nuttall (eds.). Making social democrats: Citizens, mindsets, realities: Essays in honour of David Marquand (pp. 69-88). Manchester: Manchester University Press. Available in: https://doi.org/10.7228/manchester/9781526120304.003.0003. (2022). Concealed silences and inaudible voices in political theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hartz, L. (1955). The liberal tradition in America. New York: Harcourt, Brace and world, inc. Hindman, M. (2009). The myth of digital democracy. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400837496. Hobson, J. A. (1909). The crisis of liberalism: new issues of democracy. London: P.S. King and Son. Jones, P. (1989). The idea of the neutral state. In R. E. Goodin and A. Reeve. Liberal neutrality (pp. 17-46). London: Routledge. Laclau, E. (1996). The death and resurrection of the theory of ideology. Journal of Political Ideologies, 1, 201-220. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1080/13569319608420738. Mannheim, K. (1936). Ideology and utopia. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner and Co., Ltd. Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1970). The German ideology. London: Lawrence and Wishart. Müller, J. W. (2016). What is populism? Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press. Parekh, B. (2000). Rethinking multiculturalism: cultural diversity and political theory. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. Pinter, H. (1998). Writing for the theatre. In H. Pinter (ed.). Various voices: prose, poetry, politics 1948-2005 (pp. 16-20). London: Faber and Faber. Rawls, J. (1996). Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press. Ricoeur, P. (1976). Interpretation theory: discourse and the surplus of meaning. Fort Worth: Texas Christian University Press.; https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/HPOL/article/view/93170
No Comments.