Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Performance and patients' satisfaction with the A7+TouchCare insulin patch pump system: A randomized controlled non-inferiority study

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • Contributors:
      Centre Hospitalier Sud Francilien; Université Paris-Saclay; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse (CHU Toulouse); Centre Hospitalier de Gonesse; Université de Montréal (UdeM); Centre Hospitalier de La Rochelle (CHR); Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes (CHU Nantes); CHU Bordeaux; Hôpital de la Conception CHU - APHM (LA CONCEPTION); Archéologies et Sciences de l'Antiquité (ArScAn); Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (UP1)-Université Paris 8 Vincennes-Saint-Denis (UP8)-Université Paris Nanterre (UPN)-Ministère de la Culture et de la Communication (MCC)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS); Cardiovasculaire, métabolisme, diabétologie et nutrition (CarMeN); Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL); Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Hospices Civils de Lyon (HCL)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)
    • بيانات النشر:
      HAL CCSD
      Public Library of Science
    • الموضوع:
      2023
    • Collection:
      Hospices Civils de Lyon (HCL): HAL
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      International audience ; BACKGROUND: We assessed the performance and patient satisfaction of a new insulin patch pump, the A7+TouchCare (Medtrum), compared with the Omnipod system. METHODS: This multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled study enrolled 100 adult patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus (A1C ≥ 6.5% and ≤ 9.5%, i.e., 48 to 80 mmol/mol) who were assigned with the Omnipod or with the A7+TouchCare pump for 3 months. The primary study outcome was the glucose management indicator (GMI) calculated with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). RESULTS: Premature withdrawals occurs respectively in 2 and 9 participants in the Omnipod and TouchCare groups. In the Per Protocol analysis, the difference in GMI between groups was 0.002% (95% confidence interval -0.251; 0.255). The non-inferiority was demonstrated since the difference between treatments did not overlap the pre-defined non-inferiority margin (0.4%). There was no significant difference in CGM parameters between groups. On average, patients in both groups were satisfied/very satisfied with the insulin pump system. Patients preferred Omnipod as an insulin management system and especially the patch delivery system but preferred the A7+TouchCare personal diabetes manager to control the system. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the A7+TouchCare insulin pump was as efficient as the Omnipod pump in terms of performance and satisfaction. CLINICAL TRAIL REGISTRATION: The study was registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov protocol register (NCT04223973).
    • Relation:
      info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/37616289; inserm-04432142; https://inserm.hal.science/inserm-04432142; https://inserm.hal.science/inserm-04432142/document; https://inserm.hal.science/inserm-04432142/file/journal.pone.0289684.pdf; PUBMED: 37616289; PUBMEDCENTRAL: PMC10449223
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.1371/journal.pone.0289684
    • Rights:
      info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
    • الرقم المعرف:
      edsbas.74670B93