Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Impact of rural versus urban setting on kidney markers: a cross-sectional study in South-Kivu, DRCongo.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • Contributors:
      UCL - SSS/IREC/NEFR - Pôle de Néphrologie; UCL - SSS/IREC/EDIN - Pôle d'endocrinologie, diabète et nutrition; UCL - SSS/IREC/SLUC - Pôle St.-Luc; UCL - SSS/IRSS - Institut de recherche santé et société; UCL - (SLuc) Service de biochimie médicale; UCL - (SLuc) Service d'endocrinologie et de nutrition; UCL - (SLuc) Service de néphrologie
    • بيانات النشر:
      BioMed Central
    • الموضوع:
      2021
    • Collection:
      DIAL@UCL (Université catholique de Louvain)
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      BACKGROUND: Most studies of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) have been conducted in urban settings. They relied on GFR estimated from serum creatinine alone and on the inexpensive, convenient urinary dipstick to assess proteinuria. The dipstick for proteinuria has not been directly compared with the gold standard albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) in a large-sized study in SSA. We hereby assessed the influence of rural versus urban location on the level, interpretation, and diagnostic performance of proteinuria dipstick versus ACR. METHODS: In a cross-sectional population-based study of CKD in both urban (n = 587) and rural (n = 730) settings in South-Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), we assessed the prevalence, performance (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value) and determinants of a positive dipstick proteinuria as compared with albuminuria (ACR). Albuminuria was subdivided into: A1 (< 30 mg/g creatinine), A2 (30 to 299 mg/g creatinine) and A3 (≥ 300 mg/g creatinine). RESULTS: The overall prevalence of positive dipstick proteinuria (≥ 1+) was 9.6 % (95 % CI, 7.9-11.3) and was higher in rural than in urban residents (13.1 % vs. 4.8 %, p < 0.001), whereas the prevalence of albuminuria (A2 or A3) was similar in both sites (6 % rural vs. 7.6 % urban, p = 0.31). In both sites, dipstick proteinuria ≥ 1 + had a poor sensitivity (< 50 %) and positive predictive value (< 11 %) for the detection of A2 or A3. The negative predictive value was 95 %. Diabetes [aOR 6.12 (1.52-24.53)] was a significant predictor of A3 whereas alkaline [aOR 7.45 (3.28-16.93)] and diluted urine [aOR 2.19 (1.35-3.57)] were the main predictors of positive dipstick proteinuria. CONCLUSIONS: ACR and dipstick proteinuria have similar positivity rates in the urban site whereas, in the rural site, dipstick was 2-fold more often positive than ACR. The poor sensitivity and positive predictive value of the dipstick as compared with ACR makes it unattractive as a ...
    • ISSN:
      1471-2369
    • Relation:
      boreal:252026; http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/252026; info:pmid/34172013; urn:EISSN:1471-2369
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.1186/s12882-021-02431-w
    • الدخول الالكتروني :
      http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/252026
      https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-021-02431-w
    • Rights:
      info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
    • الرقم المعرف:
      edsbas.72CC644F