Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Meropenem versus piperacillin-tazobactam for definitive treatment of bloodstream infections caused by AmpC beta-lactamase-producing enterobacter spp, citrobacter freundii, morganella morganii, providencia spp, or serratia marcescens: A pilot multicenter randomized controlled trial (MERINO-2) ; Meropenem versus piperacillin-tazobactam for definitive treatment of bloodstream infections caused by AmpC β-Lactamase–producing enterobacter spp, citrobacter freundii, morganella morganii, providencia spp, or serratia marcescens: A pilot multicenter randomized controlled trial (MERINO-2)

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • بيانات النشر:
      Oxford University Press
    • الموضوع:
      2021
    • Collection:
      İstanbul Medipol University Institutional Repository (DSpace@Medipol)
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      Background: Carbapenems are recommended treatment for serious infections caused by AmpC-producing gram-negative bacteria but can select for carbapenem resistance. Piperacillin-tazobactam may be a suitable alternative. Methods: We enrolled adult patients with bloodstream infection due to chromosomal AmpC producers in a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Patients were assigned 1:1 to receive piperacillin-tazobactam 4.5 g every 6 hours or meropenem 1 g every 8 hours. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of death, clinical failure, microbiological failure, and microbiological relapse at 30 days. Results: Seventy-two patients underwent randomization and were included in the primary analysis population. Eleven of 38 patients (29%) randomized to piperacillin-tazobactam met the primary outcome compared with 7 of 34 patients (21%) in the meropenem group (risk difference, 8% [95% confidence interval {CI},-12% to 28%]). Effects were consistent in an analysis of the per-protocol population. Within the subcomponents of the primary outcome, 5 of 38 (13%) experienced microbiological failure in the piperacillin-tazobactam group compared to 0 of 34 patients (0%) in the meropenem group (risk difference, 13% [95% CI, 2% to 24%]). In contrast, 0% vs 9% of microbiological relapses were seen in the piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem arms, respectively. Susceptibility to piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem using broth microdilution was found in 96.5% and 100% of isolates, respectively. The most common AmpC β-lactamase genes identified were blaCMY-2, blaDHA-17, blaCMH-3, and blaACT-17. No ESBL, OXA, or other carbapenemase genes were identified. Conclusions: Among patients with bloodstream infection due to AmpC producers, piperacillin-tazobactam may lead to more microbiological failures, although fewer microbiological relapses were seen. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT02437045. ; Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Foundation ; Pathology Queensland-Study, Education and Research Committee ; National Health and ...
    • File Description:
      application/pdf
    • ISSN:
      2328-8957
    • Relation:
      Open Forum Infectious Diseases; Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı; Stewart, A. G., Paterson, D. L., Young, B., Lye, D. C., Davis, J. S., Schneider, K. . Harris, P. N. A. (2021). Meropenem versus piperacillin-tazobactam for definitive treatment of bloodstream ınfections caused by AmpC beta-lactamase-producing enterobacter spp, citrobacter freundii, morganella morganii, providencia spp, or serratia marcescens: A pilot multicenter randomized controlled trial (MERINO-2). Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 8(8). https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab387; https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab387; https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12511/8580; Q2; Q1
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.1093/ofid/ofab387
    • Rights:
      info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess ; Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International ; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
    • الرقم المعرف:
      edsbas.6A06A349