نبذة مختصرة : The present article intends to analyze the limits and possibilities of the application of the concept of public sphere to postnational constellation. Following Nancy Fraser’s argument in order to reformulate a critical theory of the public sphere with emancipatory purpose, we critically interrogate the consequences of her interpretation, which runs the risk of abandon the social genesis of normative principles that are suggested to rethink the public sphere in contexts of transnational democracies. We propose that the renewed critical concept of public sphere should be reconstructed in an immanent way, i. e., from the practical experiences and open political processes in which critical theory can reconstruct its normative categories and prognosticate real possibilities of emancipation in terms of deepening transnational democracy. ; O presente artigo pretende analisar os limites e possibilidades da aplicação do conceito de esfera pública na constelação pós-nacional. Seguindo o argumento de Nancy Fraser com a finalidade de reformular uma teoria crítica da esfera pública com propósitos emancipatórios, interrogamos criticamente as consequências de sua interpretação, que corre o risco de abandonar a gênese social dos princípios normativos que são sugeridos para repensar a esfera pública nos contextos de democracias transnacionais. Propomos que o conceito crítico e renovado de esfera pública deve ser reconstruído de maneira imanente, ou seja, a partir das experiências práticas e dos processos políticos abertos em que a teoria crítica pode reconstruir suas categorias normativas e prognosticar possibilidades reais de emancipação em termos de um aprofundamento da democracia transnacional.
Relation: https://periodicos.ufpe.br/revistas/perspectivafilosofica/article/view/230261/24491; ARATO, Andrew and COHEN, Jean. Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge/London: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1992.; BAYNES, Kenneth. The Normative Grounds of Social Criticism: Kant, Rawls, Habermas. New York: State University of New York Press, 1992.; BENHABIB, Seyla. Models of Public Space: Hannah Arendt, the Liberal Tradition, and Jürgen Habermas. In: BENHABIB, Seyla. Situating the Self: Gender, Community, and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics. New York: Routledge, 1992.; BOHMAN, James. Democracy across Borders. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2007.; CALHOUN, Craig (ed.). Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge/London: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1992.; CELIKATES, Robin. Digital Publics, Digital Contestation: A New Structural Transformation of the Public Spheres? In: CELIKATES, Robin; KREIDE, Regina; WESCHE, Tilo. (eds.) Transformations of Democracy: Crisis, Protest and Legitimation. London/New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 2015.; COULDRY, Nick. What and Where is the Transnationalized Public Sphere? In: FRASER et al. Transnationalizing the Public Sphere. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2014.; FRASER, Nancy. Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy. In: FRASER, Nancy. Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the “Postsocialist” Conditions. New York: Routledge.; FRASER, Nancy. 2010. Transnationalizing the Public Sphere: On the Legitimacy and Efficacy of Public Opinion in a Postwestphalian World. In: FRASER, N. Scales of Justice: Reimagining Political Space in a Global World. New York: Columbia University Press.; MELO, Rúrion. Repensando a esfera pública: Esboço de uma teoria crítica da democracia. Lua Nova, 94, 2015.; HABERMAS, Jürgen. Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1962.; HABERMAS, Jürgen. Theorie und Praxis. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1971.; HABERMAS, Jürgen. Faktizität und Geltung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1994.; HORKHEIMER, Max. Traditionelle und kritische Theorie [1937]. In: Gesemmelte Schriften, Band 4. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer, 2009.; KURASAWA, Fuyuki. An Alternative Transnational Public Sphere? On Anarchist Cosmopolitanism in Post-Westphalian Times. In: FRASER et al. Transnationalizing the Public Sphere. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2014.; PETERS, Bernhard. Die Integration moderner Gesellschaften. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1993.; PETERS, Bernhard. Public Deliberation and Public Culture. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2008.; TULLY, James. On the Global Multiplicity of Public Spheres: The Democractic Transformation of the Public Sphere? In: EMDEN, Christian e MIDGLEY, David. (eds.) Beyond Habermas: Democracy, Knowledge, and the Public Sphere. New York: Berghahn Books, 2013.; https://periodicos.ufpe.br/revistas/perspectivafilosofica/article/view/230261
No Comments.