Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

L'invention de la sphère domestique au sortir de la Révolution

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • Contributors:
      Groupe d'Analyse des Politiques Publiques (GAPP); École normale supérieure - Cachan (ENS Cachan)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS); Middlebury College
    • بيانات النشر:
      HAL CCSD
      Armand Colin
    • الموضوع:
      2002
    • Collection:
      Archive ouverte HAL (Hyper Article en Ligne, CCSD - Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)
    • الموضوع:
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      National audience ; Nation and family were imagined together on the eve of the French Revolution. The family was not considered as a distinctive private sphere, but rather as a political association like any other association in France; conversely, the nation itself was conceived of as a family under the authority of a father-king. Revolutionaries transformed both realms in a series of dramatic measures, from the unprecedented institutions of secular marriage and divorce to the proclamation of popular sovereignty and the famous Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen. Nonetheless, they continued to think in some of the same terms, treating the family as a political unit and the nation as a family, one now embodied by the French people as a whole rather than the monarchy. Indeed, such hidden continuites became even more important just as revolutionaries attempted to completely destroy the old political order by executing the king. Because revolutionary juridical and political categories did not define the family as an intermediary between the individual and the state, they helped open the way for debates about both the rights and the duties of citizenship for women and children. While legislators often assumed that the citizen was, or should be, the paterfamilias (the term often included not only fathers of families, but also adult men capable of becoming heads of households), they rarely stated their assumptions. Ambiguity about the nature of citizenship, combined with the conflation of family and nation, provoked not only contestation over the role of women in the sovereign, but also conflicts between national and familial duties in a variety of other, often unexpected, arenas. In the wake of the Terror, revolutionaries redefined the family as special kind of association, qualitatively different than other forms of civil society, and similarly redefined the nation as an agglomerate of families. They proclaimed that the citizen should be clearly equated with the paterfamilias who served as the intermediary ...
    • Relation:
      halshs-00003785; https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00003785; https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00003785/document; https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00003785/file/AHRF-num327-6.pdf
    • Rights:
      info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
    • الرقم المعرف:
      edsbas.636D9A39