Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Ferrochrome waste management : addressing current gaps

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • Contributors:
      Beukes, J.P.; Van Zyl, P.G.; 10092390 - Beukes, Johan Paul (Supervisor); 10710361 - Van Zyl, Pieter Gideon (Supervisor)
    • بيانات النشر:
      North-West University (South Africa), Potchefstroom Campus
    • الموضوع:
      2018
    • Collection:
      North-West University, South Africa: Boloka (NWU-IR)
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      PhD (Chemistry), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2018 ; Various chromium (Cr) compounds, Cr metal and/or Cr-containing alloys are used in modern society. By volume the largest application for Cr is in the production of stainless steel, which owes its corrosion resistance mainly to the inclusion of Cr. Stainless steel is mostly produced from recycled scrap and ferrochrome (FeCr), a relatively crude alloy between Cr and iron (Fe). FeCr is mainly produced by the carbothermic reduction of chromite in submerged arc furnaces (SAFs) and direct current (DC) arc furnaces. Various wastes are generated during FeCr production, depending on the production route used. By reviewing the production routes, three currently applied wastes handling strategies were identified as requiring improvement, which were subsequently investigated. The first waste handling strategy investigated was the leaching of Cr(VI) from bag filter dust (BFD), originating from semi-closed SAF off-gas cleaning (results presented in Chapter 3). Small amounts of Cr(VI) are unintentionally formed during FeCr production. BFD contains the highest concentration of Cr(VI) of all FeCr wastes. Currently, BFD is contacted with water and treated to chemically reduce Cr(VI) before it is disposed in fit-for-purpose slimes dams. A major concern for FeCr producers is the presence of relatively high Cr(VI) concentrations in slimes dams, notwithstanding the treatment prior to disposal. The results presented in this study proved that the currently applied Cr(VI) treatment strategies of FeCr producer (with process water pH ≤ 9) only effectively extract and treat the water-soluble Cr(VI) compounds, which merely represent approximately 31% of the total Cr(VI) present in BFD. Extended extraction time, within the afore-mentioned pH range (pH ≤ 9), proved futile in extracting sparingly and water-insoluble Cr(VI) species, which represented approximately 34 and 35% of the total Cr(VI), respectively. Due to the deficiencies of the current treatment strategies, it is ...
    • File Description:
      application/pdf
    • Relation:
      http://hdl.handle.net/10394/27584; https://orcid.org/ 0000-0001-5214-3693
    • الدخول الالكتروني :
      http://hdl.handle.net/10394/27584
      https://orcid.org/ 0000-0001-5214-3693
    • الرقم المعرف:
      edsbas.59E961F7