Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Informed Bayesian survival analysis

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • المؤلفون: Bartoš, F.; Aust, F.; Haaf, J.M.
  • المصدر:
    Bartoš , F , Aust , F & Haaf , J M 2022 , ' Informed Bayesian survival analysis ' , BMC Medical Research Methodology , vol. 22 , 238 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01676-9
  • نوع التسجيلة:
    article in journal/newspaper
  • اللغة:
    English
  • معلومة اضافية
    • الموضوع:
      2022
    • Collection:
      Universiteit van Amsterdam: Digital Academic Repository (UvA DARE)
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      Background: We provide an overview of Bayesian estimation, hypothesis testing, and model-averaging and illustrate how they benefit parametric survival analysis. We contrast the Bayesian framework to the currently dominant frequentist approach and highlight advantages, such as seamless incorporation of historical data, continuous monitoring of evidence, and incorporating uncertainty about the true data generating process. Methods : We illustrate the application of the outlined Bayesian approaches on an example data set, retrospective re-analyzing a colon cancer trial. We assess the performance of Bayesian parametric survival analysis and maximum likelihood survival models with AIC/BIC model selection in fixed-n and sequential designs with a simulation study. Results : In the retrospective re-analysis of the example data set, the Bayesian framework provided evidence for the absence of a positive treatment effect of adding Cetuximab to FOLFOX6 regimen on disease-free survival in patients with resected stage III colon cancer. Furthermore, the Bayesian sequential analysis would have terminated the trial 10.3 months earlier than the standard frequentist analysis. In a simulation study with sequential designs, the Bayesian framework on average reached a decision in almost half the time required by the frequentist counterparts, while maintaining the same power, and an appropriate false-positive rate. Under model misspecification, the Bayesian framework resulted in higher false-negative rate compared to the frequentist counterparts, which resulted in a higher proportion of undecided trials. In fixed-n designs, the Bayesian framework showed slightly higher power, slightly elevated error rates, and lower bias and RMSE when estimating treatment effects in small samples. We found no noticeable differences for survival predictions. We have made the analytic approach readily available to other researchers in the RoBSA R package. Conclusions : The outlined Bayesian framework provides several benefits when applied to parametric ...
    • File Description:
      application/pdf
    • Relation:
      https://dare.uva.nl/personal/pure/en/publications/informed-bayesian-survival-analysis(ce4cef2d-471d-4019-80db-756e6edfa72b).html
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.1186/s12874-022-01676-9
    • الدخول الالكتروني :
      https://dare.uva.nl/personal/pure/en/publications/informed-bayesian-survival-analysis(ce4cef2d-471d-4019-80db-756e6edfa72b).html
      https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01676-9
      https://hdl.handle.net/11245.1/ce4cef2d-471d-4019-80db-756e6edfa72b
      https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/97713627/s12874_022_01676_9.pdf
      http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85138128795&partnerID=8YFLogxK
      https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/RoBSA/index.html
      https://osf.io/ybw9v/
      https://osf.io/8skf7
    • Rights:
      info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
    • الرقم المعرف:
      edsbas.59D22693