Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Sources of Uncertainty in Regional and Global Terrestrial CO 2 Exchange Estimates

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • Contributors:
      LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITAT MUNCHEN DEPARTMENT OF GEOGRAPHY MUNICH DEU; Partenaires IRSTEA; Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies pour l'environnement et l'agriculture (IRSTEA)-Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies pour l'environnement et l'agriculture (IRSTEA); Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement Gif-sur-Yvette (LSCE); Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Direction de Recherche Fondamentale (CEA) (DRF (CEA)); Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA); ICOS-ATC (ICOS-ATC); Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Direction de Recherche Fondamentale (CEA) (DRF (CEA)); Agronomie; AgroParisTech-Université Paris-Saclay-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE); College of Life and Environmental Sciences Exeter; University of Exeter; College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences Exeter (EMPS); Modélisation INVerse pour les mesures atmosphériques et SATellitaires (SATINV); Max-Planck-Institut für Biogeochemie (MPI-BGC); Max Planck Institute for Meteorology (MPI-M); Max-Planck-Gesellschaft; WUR - Wageningen University and Research Centre Wageningen; Research Institute for Global Change (RIGC); Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC); Modélisation des Surfaces et Interfaces Continentales (MOSAIC); CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere; CISRO Oceans and Atmosphere; Department of Geosciences, Environment and Society; Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB); Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Earth System Modeling, Department of Earth System Science, Tsinghua University; Wageningen University and Research Wageningen (WUR); Centre for Isotope Research Groningen (CIO); University of Groningen Groningen; Department of Geography, University of Augsburg; Department of Atmospheric Sciences Urbana; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Urbana (UIUC); University of Illinois System-University of Illinois System; Institute of Applied Energy (IAE); Climate and Environmental Physics Bern (CEP); Physikalisches Institut Bern; Universität Bern / University of Bern (UNIBE)-Universität Bern / University of Bern (UNIBE); CLIMATE AND GLOBAL DYNAMICS LABORATORY NATIONAL CENTER FOR ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH BOULDER USA; Centre national de recherches météorologiques (CNRM); Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées (OMP); Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3); Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales Toulouse (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Météo-France-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3); Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales Toulouse (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Météo-France-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS); Biospheric Sciences Laboratory; NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC); INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR CLIMATE AND GLOBAL CHANGE RESEARCH AUBURN UNIVERSITY AUBURN USA; Environmental Sciences Division and Climate Change Science Institute, Oak Ridge National Laboratory; Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry (MPI-BGC); European Comission. Grant Numbers: ASICA (649087), IMBALANCE-P European Space Agency (ESA). Grant Number: ESRIN/ 4000123002/18/I-NB National Science Foundation (NSF). Grant Number: AGS 12-43071 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). Grant Number: DESC0016323; ANR-16-CONV-0003,CLAND,CLAND : Changement climatique et usage des terres(2016)
    • بيانات النشر:
      HAL CCSD
      American Geophysical Union
    • الموضوع:
      2020
    • Collection:
      AgroParisTech: HAL (Institut des sciences et industries du vivant et de l'environnement)
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      International audience ; The Global Carbon Budget 2018 (GCB2018) estimated by the atmospheric CO 2 growth rate, fossil fuel emissions, and modeled (bottom-up) land and ocean fluxes cannot be fully closed, leading to a "budget imbalance," highlighting uncertainties in GCB components. However, no systematic analysis has been performed on which regions or processes contribute to this term. To obtain deeper insight on the sources of uncertainty in global and regional carbon budgets, we analyzed differences in Net Biome Productivity (NBP) for all possible combinations of bottom-up and top-down data sets in GCB2018: (i) 16 dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs), and (ii) 5 atmospheric inversions that match the atmospheric CO 2 growth rate. We find that the global mismatch between the two ensembles matches well the GCB2018 budget imbalance, with Brazil, Southeast Asia, and Oceania as the largest contributors. Differences between DGVMs dominate global mismatches, while at regional scale differences between inversions contribute the most to uncertainty. At both global and regional scales, disagreement on NBP interannual variability between the two approaches explains a large fraction of differences. We attribute this mismatch to distinct responses to El Niño-Southern Oscillation variability between DGVMs and inversions and to uncertainties in land use change emissions, especially in South America and Southeast Asia. We identify key needs to reduce uncertainty in carbon budgets: reducing uncertainty in atmospheric inversions (e.g., through more observations in the tropics) and in land use change fluxes, including more land use processes and evaluating land use transitions (e.g., using high-resolution remote-sensing), and, finally, improving tropical hydroecological processes and fire representation within DGVMs.
    • Relation:
      hal-02904064; https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02904064; https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02904064/document; https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02904064/file/SourcesofUncertaintyinRegionalandGlobalTerrestrial%20CO2%20ExchangeEstimates.pdf; WOS: 000520158900012
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.1029/2019GB006393
    • الدخول الالكتروني :
      https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GB006393
      https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02904064
      https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02904064/document
      https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02904064/file/SourcesofUncertaintyinRegionalandGlobalTerrestrial%20CO2%20ExchangeEstimates.pdf
    • Rights:
      http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/ ; info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
    • الرقم المعرف:
      edsbas.59221CD2