Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Deliberation and decisions in the IRB process

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
اقرأ أكثر حفظ في قائمتي
  • المؤلفون: Dubler, Nancy Neveloff
  • المصدر:
    الطب الاجتماعي; Vol 7, No 3 (2013): Festschrift in Honor of Dr. Victor Sidel / Guest Editor: Judith B. Kaplan, MS; 144-146 ; Social Medicine; Vol 7, No 3 (2013): Festschrift in Honor of Dr. Victor Sidel / Guest Editor: Judith B. Kaplan, MS; 144-146 ; 1557-7112
  • نوع التسجيلة:
    article in journal/newspaper
  • اللغة:
    English
  • معلومة اضافية
    • بيانات النشر:
      Social Medicine Publishing Group
    • الموضوع:
      2013
    • Collection:
      Social Medicine / Medicina Social (E-Journal)
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      Institutional review boards (IRBs) regularly vote to resolve conflict. This article argues that voting minimizes protections for human subjects and violates moral order. Rather than vote, IRBs should be mediating disputes, which respects the moral difference and integrity of IRB members.
    • File Description:
      application/pdf
    • Relation:
      https://www.socialmedicine.info/index.php/socialmedicine/article/view/738/1378; https://www.socialmedicine.info/index.php/socialmedicine/article/view/738
    • الدخول الالكتروني :
      https://www.socialmedicine.info/index.php/socialmedicine/article/view/738
    • الرقم المعرف:
      edsbas.58E9716C