نبذة مختصرة : Diplomsko delo izkoristi polemiko med Eberhardom in Kantom za širšo primerjavo Kantove prve Kritike z leibniz-wolffovsko tradicijo na osnovi nekaterih trditev Eberharda, kot je njegova izjava, da v Kantovi misli ni ničesar, česar ne bi bilo mogoče eksplicirati s pomočjo Leibnizove metafizike. V diplomskem delu izkoristimo primerjavo nekaterih pojmov in koncepcije zmote na eni strani ter na drugi za to, da pišemo o treh pristopih k pojmu resnice. Trdimo, da Kant odpre možnost za resnico drugačne vrste. V delu se poskušamo, kolikor je le mogoče, opirati na misli obeh izvirnih avtorjev polemike. ; The diploma takes advantage of the polemics between Eberhard and Kant to make a broader comparison between Kant’s first Critique and the Leibniz-Wolffian tradition based on some of Eberhard’s claims, like his assertion that there is nothing in Kant’s thought that could not successfully be explicated with the help of Leibniz’s metaphysics. The thrust of the work is in using the comparison of certain concepts and the conception of error in the one and the other to discuss three approaches to the concept of truth. I claim that Kant opens the possibility for a truth of a different kind. I attempt to keep the authors of the polemic in my work as much as possible.
No Comments.