Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Combining self-reported and objectively measured survey data to improve hypertension prevalence estimates: Portuguese experience

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • بيانات النشر:
      BMC/ Belgian Public Health Association
    • الموضوع:
      2021
    • Collection:
      National Health Institute, Portugal: Repositório Científico
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      Background: Accurate data on hypertension is essential to inform decision-making. Hypertension prevalence may be underestimated by population-based surveys due to misclassification of health status by participants. Therefore, adjustment for misclassification bias is required when relying on self-reports. This study aims to quantify misclassification bias in self-reported hypertension prevalence and prevalence ratios in the Portuguese component of the European Health Interview Survey (INS2014), and illustrate application of multiple imputation (MIME) for bias correction using measured high blood pressure data from the first Portuguese health examination survey (INSEF). Methods: We assumed that objectively measured hypertension status was missing for INS2014 participants (n = 13,937) and imputed it using INSEF (n = 4910) as auxiliary data. Self-reported, objectively measured and MIME-corrected hypertension prevalence and prevalence ratios (PR) by sex, age group and education were estimated. Bias in self-reported and MIME-corrected estimates were computed using objectively measured INSEF data as a gold-standard. Results: Self-reported INS2014 data underestimated hypertension prevalence in all population subgroups, with misclassification bias ranging from 5.2 to 18.6 percentage points (pp). After MIME-correction, prevalence estimates increased and became closer to objectively measured ones, with bias reduction to 0 pp - 5.7 pp. Compared to objectively measured INSEF, self-reported INS2014 data considerably underestimated prevalence ratio by sex (PR = 0.8, 95CI = [0.7, 0.9] vs. PR = 1.2, 95CI = [1.1, 1.4]). MIME successfully corrected direction of association with sex in bivariate (PR = 1.1, 95CI = [1.0, 1.3]) and multivariate analyses (PR = 1.2, 95CI = [1.0, 1.3]). Misclassification bias in hypertension prevalence ratios by education and age group were less pronounced and did not require correction in multivariate analyses. Conclusions: Our results highlight the importance of misclassification bias analysis in ...
    • ISSN:
      0778-7367
    • Relation:
      https://archpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13690-021-00562-y; Arch Public Health. 2021 Apr 8;79(1):45. doi:10.1186/s13690-021-00562-y; http://hdl.handle.net/10400.18/7727
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.1186/s13690-021-00562-y
    • الدخول الالكتروني :
      http://hdl.handle.net/10400.18/7727
      https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-021-00562-y
    • Rights:
      openAccess ; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
    • الرقم المعرف:
      edsbas.539126A3