نبذة مختصرة : In subsequent data analyses associated with this article, the authors became aware of a coding error due to which there was an underadjustment for age. As such the following corrections are required. In the Methods and findings subsection of the Abstract the fifth sentence is incorrect. The correct sentence is: Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals for increasing quarters of the PA distribution relative to the lowest fourth were for moderate-intensity PA: 0.79 (0.73, 0.86), 0.70 (0.64, 0.76), and 0.58 (0.53, 0.65); for vigorous-intensity PA: 0.79 (0.72, 0.86), 0.65 (0.59,0.72), and 0.56 (0.50,0.62); and for total volume of PA: 0.79 (0.73, 0.86), 0.72 (0.66, 0.79), and 0.60 (0.54, 0.66). In the Results the third sentence of the second paragraph is incorrect. The correct sentence is: Compared with the lowest category of moderate-intensity PA, the HRs and 95% Cis for increasing quarters were 0.79 (0.73, 0.86), 0.70 (0.64, 0.76), and 0.58 (0.53, 0.65) (Fig 1), and the corresponding values for vigorous activity were: 0.79 (0.72, 0.86), 0.65 (0.59,0.72), and 0.56 (0.50,0.62). In the Subgroup, secondary, and sensitivity analyses subsection of the Results the second sentence of the fourth paragraph is incorrect. The correct sentence is: Furthermore, sensitivity analyses conducted to examine the inclusion of additional covariates (hypertension, self-rated health, BMI, total cholesterol, HDL, LDL, triglycerides, C-reactive protein, HbA1c, red and processed meat, fresh fruit, and cooked vegetables) to the multivariable Cox models utilised in the main analyses attenuated the HRs by just 6.0% to 20.0% (S2-S4 Tables). In the Discussion the second sentence of the first paragraph is incorrect. The correct sentence is: We found broadly similar associations within each subcomponent of CVD, and the associations were comparable for men and women, with the exception of vigorous activity where there was a 14% lower risk for incident CVD among men compared with 27% lower risk among women for the second quarter compared to ...
No Comments.