Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

A Phase III Study of Belatacept Versus Cyclosporine in Kidney Transplants from Extended Criteria Donors (BENEFIT-EXT Study)

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • Contributors:
      Univ Paris 11; Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP); Emory Univ; Univ Calif San Francisco; Complexo Hosp Santa Casa; Univ Barcelona; Inst Nefrol; Tulane Sch Med; Bristol Myers Squibb Co; Univ Hosp Bellvitge
    • بيانات النشر:
      Wiley-Blackwell
    • الموضوع:
      2010
    • Collection:
      Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP): Repositório Institucional
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      Recipients of extended criteria donor (ECD) kidneys are at increased risk for graft dysfunction/loss, and may benefit from immunosuppression that avoids calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) nephrotoxicity. Belatacept, a selective costimulation blocker, may preserve renal function and improve long-term outcomes versus CNIs. BENEFIT-EXT (Belatacept Evaluation of Nephroprotection and Efficacy as First-line Immunosuppression Trial-EXTended criteria donors) is a 3-year, Phase III study that assessed a more (MI) or less intensive (LI) regimen of belatacept versus cyclosporine in adult ECD kidney transplant recipients. the coprimary endpoints at 12 months were composite patient/graft survival and a composite renal impairment endpoint. Patient/graft survival with belatacept was similar to cyclosporine (86% MI, 89% LI, 85% cyclosporine) at 12 months. Fewer belatacept patients reached the composite renal impairment endpoint versus cyclosporine (71% MI, 77% LI, 85% cyclosporine; p = 0.002 MI vs. cyclosporine; p = 0.06 LI vs. cyclosporine). the mean measured glomerular filtration rate was 4-7 mL/min higher on belatacept versus cyclosporine (p = 0.008 MI vs. cyclosporine; p = 0.1039 LI vs. cyclosporine), and the overall cardiovascular/metabolic profile was better on belatacept versus cyclosporine. the incidence of acute rejection was similar across groups (18% MI; 18% LI; 14% cyclosporine). Overall rates of infection and malignancy were similar between groups; however, more cases of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) occurred in the CNS on belatacept. ECD kidney transplant recipients treated with belatacept-based immunosuppression achieved similar patient/graft survival, better renal function, had an increased incidence of PTLD, and exhibited improvement in the cardiovascular/metabolic risk profile versus cyclosporine-treated patients. ; Bristol- Myers Squibb ; Roche ; Pfizer ; Novartis ; Astellas ; Genzyme ; Genentech ; Univ Paris 11, IFRNT, Bicetre Hosp, Paris, France ; Hosp Rim & Hipertensao Unifesp, São Paulo, ...
    • File Description:
      547-557
    • ISBN:
      978-0-00-274621-2
      0-00-274621-2
    • ISSN:
      1600-6135
    • Relation:
      American Journal of Transplantation; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03016.x; American Journal of Transplantation. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc, v. 10, n. 3, p. 547-557, 2010.; http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/32295; WOS:000274621200016
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03016.x
    • Rights:
      Acesso aberto ; http://olabout.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-406071.html
    • الرقم المعرف:
      edsbas.4235E54E