نبذة مختصرة : Erzsebet Kovács,1 Zsuzsanna Bereczky,2 Adrienne Kerényi,3 Renáta Laczik,4 Valéria Nagy,5 Dávid Ãgoston Kovács,6 Sándor Kovács,7 György Pfliegler1 1Centre of Rare Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary; 2Division of Clinical Laboratory Science, Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary; 3Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary; 4Division of Angiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary; 5Department of Ophthalmology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary; 6Department of Surgery, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary; 7Department of Research Methodology and Statistics, Institute of Sectoral Economics and Methodology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, HungaryCorrespondence: Erzsebet Kovács, Centre of Rare Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, 98 Nagyerdei krt, Debrecen, H-4032, Hungary, Tel +36 52 255574, Email erzsebetkovacs@med.unideb.huBackground: The clinical relevance of thrombophilic laboratory factors, especially the “mild†ones, and the need for their screening is not generally recommended in venous (VTE) and/or arterial (ATE) thromboembolism.Methods: Our aim was to investigate possible associations between comorbidities and 16 inherited/acquired “severe†and “mild†laboratory thrombophilic factors (detailed in introduction) in patients (n=348) with VTE/ATE without a serious trigger (high-risk surgical intervention, active cancer and/or chemo-radiotherapy). Cases with VTE/ATE were enrolled when the thrombotic event occurred under the age of 40, in case of positive family history, recurrent thromboembolism, idiopathic event or unusual location. Patients without a detailed thrombophilia screening or who suffered from both ATE/VTE were excluded to find potential distinct thrombosis type specific thrombophilic risks. The possible role of “mild†factor accumulation was also ...
No Comments.