Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Radial-Artery or Saphenous-Vein Grafts in Coronary-Artery Bypass Surgery

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • المؤلفون: Gaudino, Mario; Benedetto, Umberto; Angelini, Gianni D
  • المصدر:
    Gaudino , M , Benedetto , U , Angelini , G D 2018 , ' Radial-Artery or Saphenous-Vein Grafts in Coronary-Artery Bypass Surgery ' , New England Journal of Medicine , vol. 378 , no. 22 , pp. 2069-2077 . https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1716026
  • نوع التسجيلة:
    article in journal/newspaper
  • اللغة:
    English
  • معلومة اضافية
    • الموضوع:
      2018
    • Collection:
      University of Bristol: Bristol Reserach
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      BACKGROUND: The use of radial-artery grafts for coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) may result in better postoperative outcomes than the use of saphenous-vein grafts. However, randomized, controlled trials comparing radial-artery grafts and saphenous-vein grafts have been individually underpowered to detect differences in clinical outcomes. We performed a patient-level combined analysis of randomized, controlled trials to compare radial-artery grafts and saphenous-vein grafts for CABG. METHODS: Six trials were identified. The primary outcome was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or repeat revascularization. The secondary outcome was graft patency on follow-up angiography. Mixed-effects Cox regression models were used to estimate the treatment effect on the outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 1036 patients were included in the analysis (534 patients with radial-artery grafts and 502 patients with saphenous-vein grafts). After a mean (±SD) follow-up time of 60±30 months, the incidence of adverse cardiac events was significantly lower in association with radial-artery grafts than with saphenous-vein grafts (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49 to 0.90; P=0.01). At follow-up angiography (mean follow-up, 50±30 months), the use of radial-artery grafts was also associated with a significantly lower risk of occlusion (hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.70; P<0.001). As compared with the use of saphenous-vein grafts, the use of radial-artery grafts was associated with a nominally lower incidence of myocardial infarction (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.99; P=0.04) and a lower incidence of repeat revascularization (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.63; P<0.001) but not a lower incidence of death from any cause (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.41; P=0.68). CONCLUSIONS: As compared with the use of saphenous-vein grafts, the use of radial-artery grafts for CABG resulted in a lower rate of adverse cardiac events and a higher rate of patency at 5 years of follow-up. (Funded by ...
    • File Description:
      application/pdf
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.1056/NEJMoa1716026
    • الدخول الالكتروني :
      https://hdl.handle.net/1983/da0c0152-dab6-4cc0-aca6-60fc9b131219
      https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/en/publications/da0c0152-dab6-4cc0-aca6-60fc9b131219
      https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1716026
      https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/ws/files/218426522/nejmoa1716026.pdf
    • Rights:
      info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
    • الرقم المعرف:
      edsbas.3EB5114