Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

État des lieux des pratiques de prise en charge des cancers des voies biliaires en France : résultats de l'enquête nationale ACABi

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • Contributors:
      Institut Curie - Saint Cloud ICSC; Institut régional de Cancérologie de Montpellier ICM; Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier IRCM - U1194 Inserm - UM; Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire CHU Lille CHRU Lille; Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine CRSA; CRLCC Eugène Marquis CRLCC; Oncogenesis, Stress, Signaling OSS; Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Besançon CHRU Besançon; Pôle Digestif CHRU Montpellier; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes CHU Rennes = Rennes University Hospital Ponchaillou; Institut Gustave Roussy IGR; Département de médecine oncologique Gustave Roussy; Cancer Heterogeneity, Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies - UMR 9020 - U 1277 CANTHER; Service d'Oncologie Médicale CHRU Besançon
    • بيانات النشر:
      John Libbey Eurotext
    • الموضوع:
      2022
    • Collection:
      LillOA (Lille Open Archive - Université de Lille)
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      Overview of biliary tract cancer management practices in France: results of the ACABi national survey INTRODUCTION: Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are rare. Their management has evolved in recent years. ACABi conducted a survey on the management practices of CVB in France. METHODS: A questionnaire was developed by a multidisciplinary team and distributed (June-July 2021) by the French digestive oncology societies. The data were analyzed according to the type of practice center (group A: university hospital or cancer comprehensive center, group B: general hospital or private hospital) RESULTS: 172 physicians (hepato-gastroenterologists: 58.0%, oncologists: 19.5% and surgeons: 18.3%), representing all French regions, responded. Access to echo-endoscopy and endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography was identical between the groups (> 80%), unlike cholangioscopy (group A: 82.9%, group B: 63.6%). In the adjuvant setting, capecitabine was proposed in the majority (> 65%). For non-operable tumors, the most commonly used first-line chemotherapy was cisplatin/gemcitabine (CISGEM, 66.3%). In 38.5% of cases, it was not performed in the day hospital and only 13.6% proposed a break after a fixed number of courses. The most commonly used second-line treatment was 5FU/oxaliplatin (FOLFOX, 52.3%). Molecular profiling was performed in more than half of the patients for 41.1% of respondents in group A and 18.8% in group B. DISCUSSION: This survey shows the application of therapeutic standards but also certain practices diverging from the recommendations as well as disparities between centers. ; 109 ; 11
    • File Description:
      application/octet-stream
    • ISSN:
      36535761
    • Relation:
      Bulletin du Cancer; http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12210/107951
    • الدخول الالكتروني :
      https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12210/107951
    • Rights:
      info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
    • الرقم المعرف:
      edsbas.3C22ED82