Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Measurement and benchmarking of workplace performance: key issues in value adding management

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • المؤلفون: Voordt, Theo J.M. van der; Jensen, Per Anker
  • المصدر:
    Voordt , T J M V D & Jensen , P A 2018 , ' Measurement and benchmarking of workplace performance: key issues in value adding management ' , Journal of Corporate Real Estate , vol. 20 , no. 3 , pp. 177-195 . https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRE-10-2017-0032
  • نوع التسجيلة:
    article in journal/newspaper
  • اللغة:
    English
  • معلومة اضافية
    • الموضوع:
      2018
    • Collection:
      Technical University of Denmark: DTU Orbit / Danmarks Tekniske Universitet
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present a process model of value-adding corporate real estate and facilities management and indicators that can be used to measure and benchmark workplace performance and the added value of workplace interventions for an organisation. Design/methodology/approach The paper compares the performance measurement and benchmarking theory with current practice and data from different work environments. The paper builds on two books on adding value through buildings, facilities and services, both edited and co-authored by the authors of this paper. The books were based on literature reviews, interviews with practitioners, cross-border studies of performance measurement and benchmarking and in-depth analyses of various value parameters by experts from different countries. In addition, theory and empirical examples of benchmarking have been included. Findings The paper presents 12 value parameters that are seen as relevant in measuring and benchmarking of workplace performance: four people-oriented, four business processes-related, two economic and two social parameters. Because not all values can be easily expressed in monetary units, various other ways of measuring are presented that can help to monitor and to benchmark workplace performance. The 12 values and ways to measure can be used to support a more integrated business case approach that goes beyond “dollar-metrics” and spreadsheet-based decision-making. Both quantitative and qualitative performance indicators, including hard and soft factors, are needed to define the trade-off between the costs and benefits of interventions in corporate real estate, facilities and services and to cope with the interests and needs of different stakeholders. Practical implications To add value to an organisation, workplaces have to provide value for money by a positive trade-off between the benefits, i.e. support of the organisational objectives and the primary processes and the costs, time and risks connected with achieving these benefits. ...
    • File Description:
      application/pdf
    • Relation:
      https://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/b570fe09-af76-4c86-84c1-2a117ab27cdd
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.1108/JCRE-10-2017-0032
    • الدخول الالكتروني :
      https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRE-10-2017-0032
      https://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/b570fe09-af76-4c86-84c1-2a117ab27cdd
      https://backend.orbit.dtu.dk/ws/files/162056308/Measurement_and_benchmarking_of_workplace_performance_JCRE_2018_Final_ma._.pdf
    • Rights:
      info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
    • الرقم المعرف:
      edsbas.1A57DF7B