Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Evaluation of In-Cloth versus On-Skin Sensors for Measuring Trunk and Upper Arm Postures and Movements

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • Contributors:
      Systèmes et Applications des Technologies de l'Information et de l'Energie (SATIE); École normale supérieure - Rennes (ENS Rennes)-Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers CNAM (CNAM)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Ecole Normale Supérieure Paris-Saclay (ENS Paris Saclay)-Université Gustave Eiffel-CY Cergy Paris Université (CY); École normale supérieure - Rennes (ENS Rennes); Karolinska Institutet Stockholm; KTH Royal Institute of Technology Kista (KTH); Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm; Department of Laboratory Medicine Karolinska Institutet
    • بيانات النشر:
      HAL CCSD
      MDPI
    • الموضوع:
      2023
    • Collection:
      Université Paris Seine: ComUE (HAL)
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      International audience ; Smart workwear systems with embedded inertial measurement unit sensors are developed for convenient ergonomic risk assessment of occupational activities. However, its measurement accuracy can be affected by potential cloth artifacts, which have not been previously assessed. Therefore, it is crucial to evaluate the accuracy of sensors placed in the workwear systems for research and practice purposes. This study aimed to compare in-cloth and on-skin sensors for assessing upper arms and trunk postures and movements, with the on-skin sensors as the reference. Five simulated work tasks were performed by twelve subjects (seven women and five men). Results showed that the mean (±SD) absolute cloth–skin sensor differences of the median dominant arm elevation angle ranged between 1.2° (±1.4) and 4.1° (±3.5). For the median trunk flexion angle, the mean absolute cloth–skin sensor differences ranged between 2.7° (±1.7) and 3.7° (±3.9). Larger errors were observed for the 90th and 95th percentiles of inclination angles and inclination velocities. The performance depended on the tasks and was affected by individual factors, such as the fit of the clothes. Potential error compensation algorithms need to be investigated in future work. In conclusion, in-cloth sensors showed acceptable accuracy for measuring upper arm and trunk postures and movements on a group level. Considering the balance of accuracy, comfort, and usability, such a system can potentially be a practical tool for ergonomic assessment for researchers and practitioners.
    • Relation:
      hal-04555977; https://hal.science/hal-04555977; https://hal.science/hal-04555977/document; https://hal.science/hal-04555977/file/sensors-23-03969-v2.pdf
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.3390/s23083969
    • Rights:
      info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
    • الرقم المعرف:
      edsbas.121B4682