Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

The optimal dosage of hyaluronic acid for bone regeneration in rat calvarial defects

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • Contributors:
      Cho, Young-Dan; Kim, Sungtae; Seol, Yang-Jo; Lee, Yong-Moo; Koo, Ki-Tae
    • بيانات النشر:
      대한치주과학회
    • الموضوع:
      2023
    • Collection:
      Seoul National University: S-Space
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      Purpose: Hyaluronic acid (HA) affects angiogenesis and promotes the migration and differentiation of mesenchymal cells, thereby activating the osteogenic ability of osteoblasts. Although studies on the action of HA during bone regeneration are being actively conducted, the optimal dose of HA required for bone regeneration remains unclear. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to elucidate the most effective HA dose for bone formation using a rat critical-size defect model.Methods: Thirty rats were randomly divided into 5 groups, with 6 rats in each group. An absorbable collagen sponge soaked with HA or saline was used to fill an 8-mm defect, which was then covered with a collagen membrane. Different treatments were performed for each group as follows: (1) saline control, (2) 1 mg/mL HA, (3) 25 mg/mL HA, (4) 50 mg/mL HA, or (5) 75 mg/mL HA. After a healing period of 4 weeks, micro-computed tomography and histological analysis were performed. The obtained values were analyzed using analysis of variance and the Tukey test (P<0.05).Results: At week 4, the 75 mg/mL HA group had the highest bone volume/total volume ratio, new bone, and bone fill among the 5 groups, and these values were significantly different from those observed in the control group (P<0.01) and 1 mg/mL HA group (P<0.001). More active bone formation was observed in the higher-dose HA groups (25 mg/mL, 50 mg/mL, and 75 mg/mL HA), which included a large amount of woven bone.Conclusions: The 75 mg/mL HA group showed better bone formation than the other groups (1, 25, and 50 mg/mL HA and control). ; Y ; 1
    • ISSN:
      2093-2278
    • Relation:
      Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science, Vol.53 No.4, pp.259-268; https://hdl.handle.net/10371/196105; 001085005200003; 2-s2.0-85146717925; 196915; ART002987644
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.5051/jpis.2203000150
    • الدخول الالكتروني :
      https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2203000150
      https://hdl.handle.net/10371/196105
    • الرقم المعرف:
      edsbas.105A2BE0