Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Paradigm Shift in Game Theory : Sociological Re-Conceptualization of Human Agency,Social Structure, and Agents' Cognitive-Normative Frameworks and Action Determination Modalities

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • بيانات النشر:
      University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden; Lisbon University Institute (ISCTE), Lisbon, Portugal;
      University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland
      Lisbon University Institute (ISCTE), Lisbon, Portugal;
      University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden; Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies, Helsinki, Finland
      Strömstad Akademi
    • الموضوع:
      2018
    • Collection:
      University West, Trollhättan: Electronic Publications (DiVA)
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      This article aims to present some of the initial work of developing a social science grounded game theory—as a clear alternative to classical game theory. Two distinct independent initiatives in Sociology are presented: One, a systems approach, social systems game theory (SGT),and the other, Erving Goffman's interactionist approach (IGT). These approaches are presented and contrasted with classical theory. They focus on the social rules, norms, roles, role relationships,and institutional arrangements, which structure and regulate human behavior. While strategic judgment and instrumental rationality play an important part in the sociological approaches, they are not a universal or dominant modality of social action determination. Rule following is considered, generally speaking, more characteristic and more general. Sociological approaches, such as those outlined in this article provide a language and conceptual tools to more adequately and effectively than the classical theory describe, model, and analyze the diversity and complexity of human interaction conditions and processes: (1) complex cognitive rule based models of the interaction situation with which actors understand and analyze their situations; (2) value complex(es) with which actors operate, often with multiple values and norms applying in interaction situations;(3) action repertoires (rule complexes) with simple and complex action alternatives—plans, programs,established (sometimes highly elaborated) algorithms, and rituals; (4) a rule complex of action determination modalities for actors to generate and/or select actions in game situations; three actionmodalities are considered here; each modality consists of one or more procedures or algorithms for action determination: (I) following or implementing a rule or rule complex, norm, role, ritual,or social relation; (II) selecting or choosing among given or institutionalized alternatives according toa rule or principle; and (III) constructing or adopting one or more alternatives according to a ...
    • File Description:
      application/pdf
    • ISBN:
      978-91-86607-41-8
      91-86607-41-3
    • Relation:
      Acta Academiae Stromstadiensis, 2001-9734; 36; http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hv:diva-13934; urn:isbn:978-91-86607-41-8
    • Rights:
      info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
    • الرقم المعرف:
      edsbas.10553738