نبذة مختصرة : Aims: To assess how well the Safer Nursing Care Tool (SNCT) predicts staffing requirements on hospital wards, and to use professional judgement to generate hypotheses about factors associated with a “poor fit”. Background: The SNCT is widely used in the UK, but there is scant evidence about factors that influence the quality of staffing decisions based upon such patient classification systems. Methods: Secondary analysis of data from 69 wards in three acute hospitals to assess the precision of the estimated staffing requirement, variation of estimates, correspondence with professional judgement and achieved staffing levels. Nursing workforce leads suggested factors associated with poor fit, based on the wards that rated worst. Results: 39% of wards were frequently understaffed, while frequent overstaffing was less common (12%). 24% of wards needed a sample of over 182 days to estimate the establishment precisely. Potential reasons identified for poor fit included high turnover, older patients, high levels of 1-to-1 specialing, cancer care, small ward size and high within-day variation in demand. Conclusions: Using a staffing tool without applying professional judgement or triangulating against other methods can lead to inaccurate estimates of staffing requirements and unsafe staffing levels. Implications for Nursing Management: Despite the availability of software to calculate staffing requirements, application of professional judgement remains essential.
Processing Request
No Comments.