نبذة مختصرة : Upstroke time (UT) and percentage of mean arterial pressure (%MAP) at the ankle have been shown to serve as atherosclerotic markers. The purpose of this study was to directly compare the diagnostic accuracy of UT with that of %MAP for clinical coronary artery disease (CAD) in subjects with a normal ankle-brachial index (ABI) in both legs. We measured UT and %MAP in 1953 subjects with a normal ABI. The optimal cutoff values of UT and %MAP derived from a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to diagnose CAD were 148 ms and 40.4%, respectively. Multivariable analyses revealed that both UT ≥ 148 ms (odds ratio [OR], 2.72; p p = 0.003) were significantly associated with CAD. When the subjects were divided into four groups according to the cutoff values of UT and %MAP, there was no significant difference in the risk of CAD between subjects with UT ≥ 148 ms and %MAP p = 0.09). ROC curve analyses revealed that the area under the curve value of UT was significantly higher than that of %MAP (0.69 vs. 0.53, p p = 0.004), whereas the addition of %MAP to traditional risk factors did not improve the diagnostic accuracy for CAD (0.82 to 0.82, p = 0.84). UT is more useful than %MAP for identifying individuals with CAD among those with a normal ABI.
Rights: CC BY
URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
No Comments.