نبذة مختصرة : The work of R. W. Connell has been extremely influential within the field of masculinity studies for at least the past decade. In particular, his concept of hegemonic masculinity has been used as a means of interrogating the practices, attitudes and meanings of both masculinities and men. In this article the author problematises Connell's tendency to map out an entire conceptual system for theorising masculinity/ies and power. This is done in two ways. First, he argues that Connell's critical review of the different ways in which masculinity has been theorised tries to lay claim to an objective position from which the patterns of masculinity will become obvious. This reduces the complexity and nuances of what the subjects of masculinity (often, men) actually do. Second, he illustrates how Connell's determination of masculinity as dominating overdetermines what men actually do, say and feel. Drawing on an example from Connell's work on masculinity and education, he argues that men's practices and motivatio...
No Comments.