Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
Defining Institutional Review Board Application Quality: Critical Research Gaps and Future Opportunities
Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
- المؤلفون: Kimberley Serpico (ORCID Kimberley Serpico (ORCID 0000-0002-0755-2233)
- اللغة:
English
- المصدر:
Research Ethics. 2024 20(1):19-35.
- الموضوع:
2024
- نوع التسجيلة:
Journal Articles
Reports - Research
- معلومة اضافية
- Peer Reviewed:
Y
- المصدر:
17
- الموضوع:
- الرقم المعرف:
10.1177/17470161231187099
- ISSN:
1747-0161
2047-6094
- نبذة مختصرة :
The quality of a research study application sends a distinct signal to the institutional review board (IRB) about the skills, capacities, preparation, communication, experience, and resources of its authors. However, efforts to research and define IRB application quality have been insufficient. Inattention to the quality of an IRB application is consequential because the application precedes IRB review, and perceptions of quality between the two may be interrelated and interdependent. Without a clear understanding of quality, IRBs do not know how to define quality and researchers do not know how to achieve quality. This position has not been systematically studied to date, and future research could provide much-needed empirical validation. This paper lays the conceptual groundwork for future investigation into what constitutes quality in an IRB application. It includes a landscape review of multidisciplinary research on quality, as well as a discussion of quality frameworks analogous to research with human participants that exist in the published literature. It also examines the background and significance of federal research regulations, regulatory burdens, researchers' regulatory literacy, and the roles and responsibilities of IRB professionals within this ecosystem.
- نبذة مختصرة :
As Provided
- الموضوع:
2024
- الرقم المعرف:
EJ1406280
No Comments.