Informed choice of entering medical school and academic success in Iranian medical students.

ACADEMIC achievement; CHI-squared test; STATISTICAL correlation; DECISION making; JUDGMENT (Psychology); MEDICAL students; STUDY & teaching of medicine; QUESTIONNAIRES; RESEARCH funding; STATISTICAL sampling; SATISFACTION; SCALE analysis (Psychology); STUDENTS; T-test (Statistics); VOCATIONAL guidance; RESEARCH methodology evaluation; DESCRIPTIVE statistics

Background: One of the challenges medical education policy-makers confront is matriculants' informed choice of entering medicine. However, students' reasons for choosing medicine do not seem rational. Aim: We compared students who made an informed choice about entering medicine with those who did not, in terms of academic success. Methods: The study was carried out with a self-administered questionnaire on 220 final-year medical students randomly selected from six Iranian medical schools. Depending on their informed choice of entering medicine or not at the time of application, they were divided into two groups. We compared these two groups' academic achievement as well as their satisfaction with medicine. Results: The students who had not made an informed choice had a higher tendency not to choose medicine if they were to start over ( p value ≤0.001). The pre-admission scores of students who had made an informed choice of medicine were worse than the other group ( p = 0.03). However, their final year scores as well as their satisfaction with medicine were higher than the other group. Conclusions: Idealistic views of medicine should be replaced by rational and logical ones to help students select the careers best suited to their abilities and talents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Medical Teacher is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)