A balancing act: The Sadrist movement between nationalist rhetoric and sectarian politics.

After the US surge in 2007, the Sadrists were at crossroads. The Mahdi Army's proclivity for violence had been discrediting Sadr's movement and was increasingly allienating its own constituency. Therefore, they started to refocus on politics. Generally, the Sadrist behaviour after 2009 can be defined as 'electoral militarism', a symbolic extension of the conflict as an electoral strategy. While the leadership has to compromise with Iran and support sectarian politics, they at the same time jealously protect the movement's nationalist outlook, using a rhetoric focused on national unity and emphasizing the movement's independence. This dualism between rhetoric and action is the most basic contradiction in the Sadrist movement today - and in Iraq in general. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of International Journal of Contemporary Iraqi Studies is the property of Intellect Ltd. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)