CELOVITOST ČLANKOV IN CITIRANJE V SLOVENSKIVVIKIPEDIJI.

The Completeness of Articles and Citation Analysis on the Slovenian Wikipedia.

Purpose: The purpose of this research was to examine the number and type of sources cited by featured articles on the Slovenian Wikipedia and to compare a sample of featured articles with a sample of random articles, with the purpose of determining an indicative framework for the quality of both. Methodology: 122 featured Wikipedia articles created in 2009, 2010 and 2011 were analysed, particularly the topic and originality of an article and the number, language and type of sources. A sample of featured articles was compared to a sample of 194 random articles which represent average Wikipedia articles. Results: The results showed that most of the featured articles were adapted from the English Wikipedia, the most common topics being natural science, sports and history. It turned out that the majority of random articles were stubs and articles with a minimal number of references, with military, sports or biographic topic. Based on these results it has been confirmed that despite their deficiencies the featured articles represent the highest-quality Wikipedia articles as compared to random articles. Research limitation: The biggest limitation of the research was the very low quality of random articles as they were mostly stubs, so it was hard to even determine sensible parameters upon which they could be analysed. Originality/practical implications: This is the first research of the Slovenian Wikipedia that focuses on citation analysis of featured articles. Results of this research offer valuable information to editors of featured articles on their own work as well as point out certain deficiencies which can be eliminated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Namen: Namen raziskave je bil preveriti, koliko in kakšne vire citirajo izbrani članki slovenske Wikipedije ter primerjati vzorec izbranih člankov z vzorcem naključnih člankov, oboje z namenom, da bi se dobila okvirna predstava o kvaliteti enih in drugih. Metodologija: Pregledanih je bilo 122 izbranih člankov slovenskeVVikipedije iz let 2009,2010 in 2011. Analizirani so bili predvsem naslednji vidiki člankov: tema in popolnost članka ter število, jezikin vrsta virov.Vzorec izbranih člankovjebil primerjan z vzorcem 194naključnih člankov, ki predstavljajo povprečne članke na slovenski VVikipediji. Rezultati: Rezultati so pokazali, da je večina izbranih člankov prirejena po angleški VVikipediji, najpogostejše tematike pa so naravoslovje, šport in zgodovina. Izkazalo se je, da večino naključnih člankov predstavljajo škrbine in članki z minimalnim številom referenc, najpogosteje z vojaško, športno ali biografsko tematiko. Na podlagi rezultatov se je potrdilo, da izbrani članki, kljub nekaterim pomanjkljivostim, v primerjavi z naključnimi članki predstavljajo najkvalitetnejše članke slovenske VVikipedije. Omejitve raziskave: Največja problematika in omejitev raziskave je izjemno slaba kvaliteta naključnih člankov, saj so to večinoma škrbine, za katere je bilo težko najti smiselne parametre, po katerih bi se jih lahko analiziralo. Izvirnost/uporabnost raziskave:Toje prva tovrstna raziskava slovenske Wikipedije, ki se ukvarja specifično z analizo citiranja v izbranih člankih. Rezultati raziskave urednikom izbranih člankov na slovenski VVikipediji ponujajo dragocene informacije glede njihovega dela ter opozarjajo na nekatere pomanjkljivosti, ki jih je mogoče odpraviti. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]