BABANZÂDE AHMET NAİM VE AHMET AGAOGLU'NA GÖRE DA'VÂ-YI AHLÂK-I AMELÎ. (Turkish)

Concept of Practical Morals According to Babanzade Ahmet Naim and Ahmet Agaoglu. (English)

AGAOGLU, Ahmet, 1869-1939; NAIM, Babanzade Ahmet

Babanzade Ahmet Naim and Ahmet Agaoglu are the two intellectuals who lived in the late Ottoman era and the first years of Republic, and also marked with the writings in relation with religious, political and social developments in these periods. Issue of morals has been one of the most mentioned issues during changing conditions of the era. Individual and social morality have been tried to be shaped each thought movement in its own systematics in experiencing rapid change and transformation of social structure. In this our article, we have distinguished Ahmet Naim who is acknowledged with the ideas and thoughts of Islamic aspects and Ahmet Agaoglu who was more effective with the ideas of pro-Turkism. We have tried to evaluate their thoughts related to practical morals. Ahmet Naim defended a morality which is an Islamic origin but Ahmet Agaoglu partially accepted religion that have a voice in the morals area and he takes a stand for rationalist-based morality, which also rather shaped by modernism. Not to exceed the volume of this article, we think to evaluate their ideas of theoretical morals in another article. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ahmet Ağaoğlu ve Babanzâde Ahmet Naim, Osmanli'nin son dönemi ile Cumhuriyet'in ilk yillarinda yaşamiş ve bu dönemlerdeki dinî, siyasî ve toplumsal gelişmelerle ilgili olarak yazdiklariyla o döneme damgasini vurmuş iki aydindir. Ahlâk konusu ise dönemin, üzerinde en çok söz söylenen meselelerinden biri olmuştur. Hizli bir değişim ve dönüşümün yaşandiği toplumsal yapida, bireysel ve toplumsal ahlâk, her bir düşünce akiminin kendi sistematiği içerisinde şekillendirilmeye çalişilmiştir. Biz bu yazimizda, İslamci görüşleriyle temâyüz etmiş Babanzâde Ahmet Naim ile daha çok Türkçülük yanlisi fikirleriyle etkili olmuş Ahmet Ağaoğlu'nun, ahlâkin amelî/pratik yönüyle alakali görüş ve düşüncelerini tespit ve değerlendirmeye çaliştik. Ahmet Naim, din/İslam kaynakli bir ahlâki savunurken, Ahmet Ağaoğlu ise dinin ahlâk sahasinda söz sahibi olmasini kismen kabul etmekle birlikte, daha çok modernizmin şekillendirdiği, rasyonalist temelli bir ahlâktan yana tavir alir. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Review of the Faculty of Divinity of Firat University / Firat Üniversitesi Ylahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi is the property of Review of the Faculty of Divinity of Firat University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)