A SILENT SPRING IN DEEP WATER?: PROPOSING FRONT-END REGULATION OF DISPERSANTS AFTER THE DEEPWATER HORIZON DISASTER.

The unprecedented use of dispersants in response to the BP Deepwater Horizon blowout and subsequent explosion revealed the weaknesses of the current U.S. oil spill emergency response apparatus. The dearth of information regarding dispersant toxicity and effectiveness at various depths highlights the need to revisit the current procedures within the National Contingency Plan for responding to oil spill emergencies. In assessing various options, the experience of pesticide regulation is informative--a front-end regulatory framework like that employed in the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act could address many of the shortcomings of federal emergency spill response. Such a regulatory approach would ensure that information about dispersants is made available before their listing on the National Contingency Plan, rather than after their ultimate application. Given the risk for harm to human health and the environment from oil spills and subsequent dispersant application, such an approach is necessary. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review is the property of Boston College Law School and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)