Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
Clinical validity of detecting K- ras mutations for the diagnosis of exocrine pancreatic cancer: a prospective study in a clinically-relevant spectrum of patients.
Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
- المؤلفون: Parker, Lucy; Porta, Miquel ; Lumbreras, Blanca; López, Tomàs; Guarner, Luisa; Hernández-Aguado, Ildefonso; Carrato, Alfredo1; Corominas, Josep; Rifà, Juli2; Fernandez, Esteve; Alguacil, Joan; Malats, Núria; Real, Francisco
- المصدر:
European Journal of Epidemiology. Mar2011, Vol. 26 Issue 3, p229-236. 8p.
- الموضوع:
- معلومة اضافية
- نبذة مختصرة :
The diagnostic utility of detecting K- ras mutations for the diagnosis of exocrine pancreatic cancer (EPC) has not been properly studied, and few reports have analysed a clinically relevant spectrum of patients. The objective was to evaluate the clinical validity of detecting K- ras mutations in the diagnosis of EPC in a large sample of clinically relevant patients. We prospectively identified 374 patients in whom one of the following diagnoses was suspected at hospital admission: EPC, chronic pancreatitis, pancreatic cysts, and cancer of the extrahepatic biliary system. Mutations in the K- ras oncogene were analysed by PCR and artificial RFLP in 212 patients. The sensitivity and specificity of the K- ras mutational status for the diagnosis of EPC were 77.7% (95% CI: 69.2-84.8) and 78.0% (68.1-86.0), respectively. The diagnostic accuracy was hardly modified by sex and age. In patients with either mutated K- ras or CEA > 5 ng/ml, the sensitivity and specificity were 81.0% (72.9-87.6) and 62.6% (72.9-87.6), respectively. In patients with mutated K- ras and CEA > 5 ng/ml the sensitivity was markedly reduced. In comparisons with a variety of non-EPC patient groups sensitivity and specificity were both always greater than 75%. In this clinically relevant sample of patients the sensitivity and specificity of K- ras mutations were not sufficiently high for independent diagnostic use. However, it seems premature to rule out the utility of K- ras analysis in conjunction with other genetic and 'omics' technologies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
No Comments.