Emotional Intelligence in Selection Contexts: Measurement method, criterion-related validity, and vulnerability to response distortion.

Two studies examined aspects of the validity of self-report and performance-based measures of emotional intelligence (EI) relevant to their use in personnel selection. In Study 1, structural equation modeling indicated that a two-factor model with separate factors for the two types of EI measures fit better than a one-factor solution. The performance-based EI factor was more related to cognitive ability ( R=.38) than personality ( R=.26), whereas the self-report EI factor was more related to personality ( R=.85) than cognitive ability ( R=.09). Although the performance-based EI factor correlated more strongly with job performance ( ρ=.24) than did that of the self-report ( ρ=.05), it provided little incremental validity beyond cognitive ability and conscientiousness. In Study 2, participants were asked to complete the measures as if applying for a job, and mean scores were then compared with those of Study 1. Results indicated that self-report EI measures were more vulnerable to distortion than were the performance-based measures. Implications for the assessment of EI in personnel selection contexts are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of International Journal of Selection & Assessment is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)