A Novel Approach Using DNA-Repair--Deficient Chicken DT40 Cell Lines for Screening and Characterizing the Genotoxicity of Environmental Contaminants.

BACTERIAL genetics; CHROMOSOME abnormalities; HAZARDOUS substances; CELL proliferation; DNA damage; DNA repair; CELL lines; LYMPHOCYTES; BIOLOGICAL assay

BACKGROUND: Many bacterial or mammalian cell-based test systems, such as the Ames test, chromosomal aberration assays, or gene mutation assays, are commonly used in developed countries to detect the genotoxicity of industrial chemicals. However, the specificity is generally limited and the sensitivity is not sufficiently high. In addition, most assays cannot provide information on mechanisms of genotoxicity of a given chemical. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to establish a sensitive and fast screening method that is also capable of characterizing mechanisms of genotoxicity. METHODS: We developed a novel bioassay employing gene-disrupted clones of the chicken DT40 B-lymphocyte line, which are designed to be deficient in several specific DNA repair pathways. Genotoxic chemicals can delay cellular proliferation in DNA-repair-deficient clones more significantly than in wild-type cells by interfering with DNA replication, thereby inducing DNA damage. In addition, we verified the validity of this assay by analyzing the genotoxicity of ?-rays, ultraviolet (UV) light, and sodium metaarsenite (NaAsO2). We also characterized DNA lesions induced by NaAsO2. RESULTS: Genotoxicity of given stressors was successfully screened based on a comparison of proliferation kinetics between wild-type and DNA-repair-deficient mutants in 48 hr. We also found that NaAsO2 apparently induces at least two types of damage: chromosomal breaks and UV photoproduct- like DNA lesions. CONCLUSION: This bioassay is a reliable and sensitive screening tool for environmental mutagens as well as for further characterizing the nature of detected genotoxicity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Environmental Health Perspectives is the property of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)