Adaptation optimizes sensory encoding for future stimuli.

Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101238922 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1553-7358 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 1553734X NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS Comput Biol Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science, [2005]-

Adaptation, Physiological*/physiology ; Photic Stimulation*; Humans ; Computational Biology ; Male ; Neural Networks, Computer ; Visual Perception/physiology ; Models, Neurological ; Adult ; Female ; Sensory Receptor Cells/physiology ; Retina/physiology ; Young Adult

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Sensory neurons continually adapt their response characteristics according to recent stimulus history. However, it is unclear how such a reactive process can benefit the organism. Here, we test the hypothesis that adaptation actually acts proactively in the sense that it optimally adjusts sensory encoding for future stimuli. We first quantified human subjects' ability to discriminate visual orientation under different adaptation conditions. Using an information theoretic analysis, we found that adaptation leads to a reallocation of coding resources such that encoding accuracy peaks at the mean orientation of the adaptor while total coding capacity remains constant. We then asked whether this characteristic change in encoding accuracy is predicted by the temporal statistics of natural visual input. Analyzing the retinal input of freely behaving human subjects showed that the distribution of local visual orientations in the retinal input stream indeed peaks at the mean orientation of the preceding input history (i.e., the adaptor). We further tested our hypothesis by analyzing the internal sensory representations of a recurrent neural network trained to predict the next frame of natural scene videos (PredNet). Simulating our human adaptation experiment with PredNet, we found that the network exhibited the same change in encoding accuracy as observed in human subjects. Taken together, our results suggest that adaptation-induced changes in encoding accuracy prepare the visual system for future stimuli.
(Copyright: © 2025 Mao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 22;12:641471. (PMID: 33692732)
Neuron. 2000 Jun;26(3):695-702. (PMID: 10896164)
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007 Jul;8(7):522-35. (PMID: 17585305)
Nat Neurosci. 2004 Jul;7(7):764-72. (PMID: 15195097)
J Vis. 2009 Apr 24;9(4):19.1-20. (PMID: 19757928)
Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2010;2010:658-666. (PMID: 25356064)
J Opt Soc Am. 1983 Dec;73(12):1684-90. (PMID: 6663371)
Phys Rev Lett. 2008 Aug 1;101(5):058103. (PMID: 18764432)
Nat Neurosci. 2015 Nov;18(11):1648-55. (PMID: 26436902)
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Jan;56(1):32-42. (PMID: 35879503)
Nat Neurosci. 2021 Jul;24(7):998-1009. (PMID: 34017131)
J Neurosci. 2013 Jan 9;33(2):532-43. (PMID: 23303933)
Neural Comput. 2016 Feb;28(2):305-26. (PMID: 26654209)
Cortex. 2024 Aug;177:302-320. (PMID: 38905873)
Vision Res. 1997 Apr;37(7):865-9. (PMID: 9156183)
Nature. 2005 Mar 17;434(7031):387-91. (PMID: 15772663)
J Vis. 2021 Aug 2;21(8):10. (PMID: 34351397)
Neural Comput. 1998 Oct 1;10(7):1731-57. (PMID: 9744895)
Annu Rev Vis Sci. 2017 Sep 15;3:227-250. (PMID: 28715956)
Nat Neurosci. 2013 Jun;16(6):724-9. (PMID: 23603708)
J Vis. 2009 Aug 24;9(9):9.1-14. (PMID: 19761342)
J Neurosci. 2022 Apr 6;42(14):2951-2962. (PMID: 35169018)
Trends Cogn Sci. 1998 Mar 1;2(3):111-7. (PMID: 21227087)
Nat Neurosci. 2002 Sep;5(9):883-91. (PMID: 12161755)
Nature. 2001 Aug 23;412(6849):787-92. (PMID: 11518957)
Vis Neurosci. 2009 Jan-Feb;26(1):81-92. (PMID: 19309533)
J Neurosci. 2019 Oct 9;39(41):8164-8176. (PMID: 31481435)
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 10;12(1):3893. (PMID: 35273206)
Vision Res. 1999 Nov;39(23):3960-74. (PMID: 10748928)
Nat Neurosci. 1999 Jan;2(1):79-87. (PMID: 10195184)
Network. 2005 Jun-Sep;16(2-3):139-49. (PMID: 16411493)
Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 15;9:345. (PMID: 29599739)
Nat Neurosci. 2015 Oct;18(10):1509-17. (PMID: 26343249)
Vision Res. 1983;23(2):129-33. (PMID: 6868387)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Sep 19;114(38):10244-10249. (PMID: 28874578)
Nat Commun. 2022 Dec 29;13(1):7972. (PMID: 36581618)
Nat Commun. 2023 Dec 15;14(1):8366. (PMID: 38102113)
Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Apr;9(4):188-94. (PMID: 15808501)
Nature. 1996 Jun 13;381(6583):607-9. (PMID: 8637596)
Neuron. 2003 Aug 14;39(4):681-91. (PMID: 12925281)
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2014 Apr;25:47-53. (PMID: 24709600)
Elife. 2018 Jun 18;7:. (PMID: 29911971)
Vision Res. 1976;16(6):609-13. (PMID: 960584)
Neural Comput. 2016 Dec;28(12):2656-2686. (PMID: 27764595)
Neural Comput. 2009 Dec;21(12):3271-304. (PMID: 19686064)
Biol Cybern. 2004 Jan;90(1):41-50. (PMID: 14762723)
Vision Res. 2002 Sep;42(20):2339-43. (PMID: 12350422)
J Vis. 2011 May 20;11(5):. (PMID: 21602298)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Nov 15;90(22):10749-53. (PMID: 8248166)
Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6. (PMID: 9176952)
Vision Res. 2001 Jan 15;41(2):151-9. (PMID: 11163850)
PLoS Biol. 2022 Dec 21;20(12):e3001889. (PMID: 36542662)
Nat Mach Intell. 2020 Apr;2(4):210-219. (PMID: 34291193)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Mar 31;95(7):4002-6. (PMID: 9520482)
Vision Res. 2007 Nov;47(25):3125-31. (PMID: 17936871)
Neuron. 2000 Oct;28(1):287-98. (PMID: 11087001)
J Opt Soc Am A. 1985 Feb;2(2):147-55. (PMID: 3973752)
Nat Neurosci. 2011 Jun 05;14(7):926-32. (PMID: 21642976)
Vision Res. 2003 Mar;43(6):717-9. (PMID: 12604107)

Date Created: 20250117 Date Completed: 20250127 Latest Revision: 20250130

20250130

PMC11771873

10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012746

39823517