Practitioner preferences in the analysis of cremation deposits in archaeology and biological anthropology: An overview of current osteoarchaeological practices with a focus on sex estimation.

Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1932-6203 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19326203 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS One Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science

Cremation* ; Archaeology*; Humans ; Male ; Female ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Sex Determination by Skeleton/methods

Osteological data, such as biological sex, constitute a base for research in paleodemography and palaeopathology, as well as for understanding past socio-cultural practices. Despite extensive research efforts concerning cremated human remains over the past decades, an internationally acknowledged, standardized osteological protocol is not fully agreed upon. Furthermore, assessing cremation research practices from the literature is challenging because analysis reports are often written in the national languages of practitioners, which makes them difficult to access by an international audience. This study addresses this gap by directly reaching out to experts working with cremated human remains through an online questionnaire in Lime Survey. The aim is to identify and characterize patterns in cremation analysis practices. A particular emphasis was put on the methods of biological sex estimation. While the significance of these data is widely acknowledged, the ways in which they are obtained in practice are seldom examined. The results of this survey reveal an absence of standardization in protocols of analysis, and data collection, as well as in reporting on the cremated remains in publications and reports. Notably, the findings reveal regional preferences in methodological choices and inconsistent institutional training. A majority of respondents expressed a preference for traditional morphological methods over recently published metric and alternative methods for sex estimation. These variations underscore the complexity of establishing standardized cremation analysis protocols and highlight the importance of considering regional contexts and training in shaping future research practices.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
(Copyright: © 2024 Hlad et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

J Forensic Sci. 2022 Sep;67(5):1948-1961. (PMID: 35880730)
J Forensic Sci. 2013 Sep;58(5):1134-1140. (PMID: 23822840)
Forensic Sci Int. 1998 Jul 6;95(1):39-45. (PMID: 9718670)
Sci Justice. 2017 Jul;57(4):262-269. (PMID: 28606332)
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2013 Jun;151(2):290-301. (PMID: 23640711)
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 30;14(1):e0209423. (PMID: 30699127)
J Forensic Sci. 1997 May;42(3):417-23. (PMID: 9144931)
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2020 Dec;173(4):734-747. (PMID: 32722856)
Int J Legal Med. 2013 Sep;127(5):1039-44. (PMID: 23344564)
J Forensic Sci. 2011 Mar;56(2):344-9. (PMID: 21265835)
Homo. 2014 Aug;65(4):311-21. (PMID: 24767538)
Int J Legal Med. 2015 Sep;129(5):1183-6. (PMID: 25649669)
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2017 Oct;164(2):440-449. (PMID: 28714560)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Dec 26;114(52):13649-13654. (PMID: 29229823)
J Forensic Sci. 2012 Mar;57(2):295-305. (PMID: 22211822)
Forensic Sci Int. 2005 Jan 29;147(2-3):113-7. (PMID: 15567614)
J Forensic Sci. 1997 Mar;42(2):181-5. (PMID: 9068175)
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2008 Mar;135(3):252-62. (PMID: 18000885)
J Forensic Sci. 2012 Mar;57(2):427-33. (PMID: 22103300)
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 30;18(8):e0289140. (PMID: 37647251)
Homo. 2011 Oct;62(5):351-8. (PMID: 21899836)
J Forensic Leg Med. 2013 Oct;20(7):906-11. (PMID: 24112343)
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2021 Aug;175(4):777-793. (PMID: 33720412)
Sci Justice. 2021 Jan;61(1):26-36. (PMID: 33357825)
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 29;12(11):e0188403. (PMID: 29186153)
J Forensic Sci. 2004 Sep;49(5):901-4. (PMID: 15461087)
Am J Biol Anthropol. 2024 May;184(1):e24874. (PMID: 37982358)
J Forensic Leg Med. 2013 Nov;20(8):1112-7. (PMID: 24237832)
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2019 Sep;15(3):392-398. (PMID: 31292824)

Date Created: 20241202 Date Completed: 20241202 Latest Revision: 20241202

20250114

PMC11611176

10.1371/journal.pone.0310380

39621707