Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity on [ 68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE/[ 68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT predicts response to [ 177 Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE PRRT in neuroendocrine tumor patients.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • المصدر:
      Publisher: Springer Nature Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 9918752082606676 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 3005-074X (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 3005074X NLM ISO Abbreviation: EJNMMI Rep Subsets: PubMed not MEDLINE
    • بيانات النشر:
      Original Publication: [London] : Springer Nature, [2024]-
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      Background: Indices of tumor heterogeneity on somatostatin receptor PET/CT scans may potentially serve as predictive biomarkers of treatment efficacy in neuroendocrine tumor (NET) patients undergoing [ 177 Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE PRRT.
      Methods: NET patients who underwent [ 177 Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE therapy at the University of Iowa from August 2018 to February 2021 were retrospectively evaluated. Radiomic features on the pre-PRRT somatostatin receptor PET/CT were evaluated using a custom MIM Software® LesionID workflow. Conventional PET/CT metrics of tumor burden, such as somatostatin receptor expression and tumor volume, were calculated in addition to the indices of tumor heterogeneity for each lesion (intra-lesional) and then summarized across all lesions throughout the body (inter-lesional). Endpoints included post-PRRT 24-month time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS). Cox regression models were used to assess the predictive ability of the imaging factors on post-PRRT 24-month TTP and OS. LASSO-penalized Cox regression was used to build a multivariable model for each outcome.
      Results: Eighty patients with a mean age of 65.1 years were included, with most (71.3%) completing 4 cycles of PRRT. Median TTP was 19.1 months, and OS at 60 months was 50%. A large degree of variability between patients was evidenced for imaging features related to somatostatin receptor expression. On multivariable analysis, total receptor expression and mean liver-corrected SUVmean were selected for 24-month TTP. The model was not able to significantly predict progression (C-statistic = 0.58, 95% CI 0.50-0.62). Total receptor expression and mean skewness were selected for OS. The resulting model was able to significantly predict death (C-statistic = 0.62, 95% CI 0.53-0.67), but the predictive ability was limited, as evidenced by the low C-statistic.
      Conclusions: Our exploratory analysis provides preliminary results showing that imaging indices of inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity from pretreatment PET/CT images may potentially predict treatment efficacy in NET patients undergoing [ 177 Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE therapy. However, prospective evaluation in a larger cohort is needed to further assess whether a comprehensive characterization of tumor heterogeneity within a patient can help guide treatment decisions.
      Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its last amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was approved by the University of Iowa Institutional Review Board (IRB#200903778). The study was granted a full waiver of HIPAA Authorization (informed consent) based on the DHHS Federal wide Assurance#FWA00003007 for this project involving retrospective secondary analysis of existing data. Consent to participate: Waived by the University of Iowa Institutional Review Board for this retrospective secondary analysis of existing data-please see the above for details. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests or relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
      (© 2024. The Author(s).)
    • References:
      Cancers (Basel). 2022 Feb 16;14(4):. (PMID: 35205733)
      Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47. (PMID: 19097774)
      Mol Imaging Biol. 2019 Jun;21(3):582-590. (PMID: 30014345)
      Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Sep 29;11(10):. (PMID: 34679494)
      Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021 Nov;48(12):4002-4015. (PMID: 33835220)
      Nucl Med Commun. 2020 Oct;41(10):1034-1039. (PMID: 32516240)
      Adv Ther. 2022 Jun;39(6):2831-2849. (PMID: 35430670)
      Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jul 21;15(14):. (PMID: 37509373)
      J Nucl Med. 2007 Jun;48(6):932-45. (PMID: 17504879)
      Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Apr 28;11(5):. (PMID: 33924854)
      EJNMMI Phys. 2021 Feb 27;8(1):21. (PMID: 33638729)
      AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Aug;213(2):309-317. (PMID: 31039017)
      Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 14;12(1):17244. (PMID: 36241749)
      Cancer Med. 2022 May;11(9):1948-1955. (PMID: 35275444)
      J Nucl Med. 2021 Oct;62(10):1406-1414. (PMID: 33579805)
      EJNMMI Res. 2020 Jun 15;10(1):63. (PMID: 32542576)
      Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2018 Jun;19(2):179-192. (PMID: 30293213)
      Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Oct;29(11):6501-6503. (PMID: 35816247)
      Mol Imaging Biol. 2015 Jun;17(3):313-8. (PMID: 25319765)
      Oncotarget. 2017 Jan 24;8(4):7039-7049. (PMID: 27705948)
      J Immunother Cancer. 2022 Oct;10(10):. (PMID: 36307149)
      Oncologist. 2018 Oct;23(10):1144-1152. (PMID: 30082489)
      Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020 Apr;47(4):881-894. (PMID: 31414209)
      Cancer Manag Res. 2019 Jul 02;11:6019-6027. (PMID: 31308743)
      Front Oncol. 2021 Aug 02;11:686235. (PMID: 34408979)
      J Neuroendocrinol. 2022 Jun;34(6):e13138. (PMID: 35485450)
      J Nucl Med. 2022 Oct;63(10):1509-1514. (PMID: 35273092)
      J Nucl Med. 2014 Jun;55(6):891-7. (PMID: 24752672)
      Cancers (Basel). 2019 Aug 31;11(9):. (PMID: 31480470)
      J Nucl Med Technol. 2013 Jun;41(2):85-91. (PMID: 23658206)
      PET Clin. 2014 Jan;9(1):83-90. (PMID: 25029937)
      Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2009 Jul;5(7):382-93. (PMID: 19488074)
      JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2019 Aug;3:1-13. (PMID: 31403818)
      N Engl J Med. 2017 Jan 12;376(2):125-135. (PMID: 28076709)
      Cancers (Basel). 2022 Aug 17;14(16):. (PMID: 36010967)
      Radiology. 2021 Mar;298(3):505-516. (PMID: 33399513)
      Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007 Sep;34(9):1427-38. (PMID: 17431616)
      PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e29336. (PMID: 22235286)
      Cancer Imaging. 2022 Jul 5;22(1):32. (PMID: 35791003)
      J Radiat Res. 2017 Nov 1;58(6):862-869. (PMID: 29036692)
      Gastroenterology. 2018 Mar;154(4):998-1008.e1. (PMID: 29155309)
      Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Mar 1;82(3):1164-71. (PMID: 21531085)
      Radiother Oncol. 2011 Jan;98(1):117-25. (PMID: 21074882)
      Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2022 Sep;1877(5):188782. (PMID: 36028148)
      Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019 Oct;46(11):2244-2251. (PMID: 31350603)
      J Nucl Med. 2019 Apr;60(4):524-529. (PMID: 30115690)
      Cancer Manag Res. 2020 Jul 30;12:6607-6614. (PMID: 32801896)
      Cancers (Basel). 2023 Mar 20;15(6):. (PMID: 36980746)
      Cancers (Basel). 2022 Sep 29;14(19):. (PMID: 36230691)
      Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019 Feb;53(1):14-29. (PMID: 30828395)
    • الموضوع:
      Date Created: 20241129 Latest Revision: 20241202
    • الموضوع:
      20241204
    • الرقم المعرف:
      PMC11607192
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.1186/s41824-024-00227-3
    • الرقم المعرف:
      39613925