Optimal biomechanical choice of implant placement in various pilon fracture types: a finite element study.

Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 100968565 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1471-2474 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14712474 NLM ISO Abbreviation: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: London : BioMed Central, [2000-

Finite Element Analysis* ; Tibial Fractures*/surgery ; Tibial Fractures*/classification ; Tibial Fractures*/physiopathology ; Fracture Fixation, Internal*/methods ; Fracture Fixation, Internal*/instrumentation ; Bone Plates*; Humans ; Biomechanical Phenomena/physiology ; Bone Screws ; Stress, Mechanical ; Ankle Fractures/surgery ; Ankle Fractures/physiopathology ; Male ; Adult ; Tibia/surgery

Background: The research on the biomechanical characteristics of individual implant placement for pilon fractures based on the different initial direction of fracture displacement is still insufficient. This study's aim is to compare the stress distribution in bones and implants with various pilon fracture types.
Methods: Varus, valgus, dorsiflexion, and plantarflexion type fractures were categorized as type I, II, III, and IV, respectively. The buttress plate was placed medially in subtypes I A and II B, whereas it was placed anterolaterally in subtypes I B and II A ; The anterior or posterior buttress plate was utilized in subtypes III A and IV A, the lag screws were applied in subtypes III B and IV B . The maximum equivalent stress of tibia (TI-S max ) and implants (IF-S max ), stress of fracture fragments (S fe ), and axial displacement values of the fracture fragments (AD fe ) in each subtype were analyzed when the ankle was in a neutral position, 15° of varus and valgus in types I and II, 15° of dorsiflexion and plantarflexion in types III and IV.
Results: Under the same axial stress loading conditions, TI-S max , S fe , AD fe of subtypes I A and II A were significantly lower than subtypes I B and II B , while IF-S max of subtypes I A and II A were obviously larger than subtypes I B and II B . Additionally, TI-S max, S fe , AD fe of subtypes III A and IV A were considerably lower as IF-S max met expectations compared to subtypes III B and IV B .
Conclusion: Based on these results, when making decisions for open reduction and internal fixation in various pilon fractures, the choice and placement of the implant can be recommended as follows: the medial buttress plate for varus types; the anterolateral plate for valgus types; the anterior plate for dorsiflexion types; the posterior plate for plantarflexion types.
Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Ethics approval was obtained from the institutional ethical committee of General Hospital of Central Theater Command (No. [2022]027–01). The study was in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. The participant gave written informed consent to participate in the study. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
(© 2024. The Author(s).)

Med Eng Phys. 2014 Oct;36(10):1322-30. (PMID: 25127377)
Injury. 2000 Sep;31 Suppl 3:C21-8. (PMID: 11052377)
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2020 Jul - Aug;59(4):664-672. (PMID: 32600559)
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2007 Dec;36(12 Suppl 2):13-7. (PMID: 18264558)
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Jul 27;15(1):283. (PMID: 32718324)
Int Orthop. 2019 Aug;43(8):1939-1950. (PMID: 31093715)
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979 Jan-Feb;(138):105-10. (PMID: 376196)
Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2021 Aug;19(4):403-416. (PMID: 34185266)
Dan Med Bull. 2010 May;57(5):A4148. (PMID: 20441715)
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2022 May;218:106701. (PMID: 35259673)
Foot Ankle Int. 2014 Sep;35(9):886-95. (PMID: 24942618)
Chir Organi Mov. 2000 Jul-Sep;85(3):205-14. (PMID: 11569083)
Front Surg. 2021 Dec 23;8:764232. (PMID: 35004835)
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005 May;87(5):692-7. (PMID: 15855374)
Foot Ankle Int. 2014 Oct;35(10):1022-30. (PMID: 24962529)
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2023 Apr;231:107366. (PMID: 36720186)
Int J Surg. 2014;12(5):418-25. (PMID: 24657711)
Foot Ankle Int. 2013 Oct;34(10):1421-6. (PMID: 23720531)
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Mar 28;17(1):186. (PMID: 35346275)
Injury. 2017 Jun;48(6):1269-1274. (PMID: 28336099)
J Orthop Trauma. 2015 Feb;29(2):69-79. (PMID: 25072286)
Foot Ankle Surg. 2024 Apr;30(3):191-218. (PMID: 38278653)
Med Eng Phys. 2016 Oct;38(10):1044-54. (PMID: 27401043)

Keywords: Buttress plate; Distal tibial fracture; Finite element analysis; Fracture displacement; Implants; Pilon fracture

Date Created: 20241126 Date Completed: 20241126 Latest Revision: 20241128

20241202

PMC11587616

10.1186/s12891-024-08076-8

39587566