Reef visitors' observation of assisted coral recovery devices in situ reduces concern about their use.

Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1932-6203 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19326203 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS One Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science

Coral Reefs* ; Conservation of Natural Resources*/methods ; Anthozoa*; Humans ; Animals ; Tourism ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Australia

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Assisted coral recovery (ACR) initiatives are establishing rapidly in coral reefs worldwide, using a variety of devices and techniques. In the Great Barrier Reef (GBR, the Reef), site-scale ACR field trials are occurring at multiple sites in the Cairns-Port Douglas region through Reef stewardship activities involving GBR tourism operators, Traditional Owners, and not-for-profit organisations. It is hypothesised that these field trials and the presence of ACR devices at reef tourism sites do not negatively affect visitor experiences, and when accompanied by appropriate educational information, can potentially help to raise awareness of Reef stewardship and conservation efforts. We tested these hypotheses using a survey of 708 Reef visitors on five tourism vessels, 346 of whom reported observing ACR devices in situ during their coral reef experience. Ordinal regression tests of survey responses found no statistical relationship between respondents' observation of ACR devices and (i) their overall Reef trip satisfaction, (ii) the perceived aesthetic beauty of the site(s) they visited, and (iii) their concern about the future health of the GBR. However, Reef visitors who observed ACR devices showed significantly lower levels of concern about the use of these devices on the Reef. The perceived quality of educational information presented to respondents was among the significant factors associated with their reef trip satisfaction and perceived beauty of reef sites. Our findings have implications for ACR practitioners and proponents who are concerned about public visibility, perceptions, and support for ACR initiatives, as the scale of such initiatives is expected to increase.
(Copyright: © 2024 Curnock et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 10;14(1):13332. (PMID: 38858572)
Nature. 2018 Apr;556(7702):492-496. (PMID: 29670282)
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 20;14(2):e0210196. (PMID: 30785877)
Environ Manage. 2009 Jan;43(1):1-16. (PMID: 18810525)
Glob Chang Biol. 2017 Sep;23(9):3437-3448. (PMID: 28247459)
Ann Rev Mar Sci. 2019 Jan 3;11:307-334. (PMID: 30606097)
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2000 Mar;104(1):1-15. (PMID: 10769936)
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Aug 15;730:139156. (PMID: 32416510)
Emerg Top Life Sci. 2022 Mar 14;6(1):125-136. (PMID: 35119476)
Sci Adv. 2021 Aug 20;7(34):. (PMID: 34417178)
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 30;17(11):e0273325. (PMID: 36449458)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Sep 19;114(38):10077-10082. (PMID: 28874573)
Conserv Biol. 2023 Apr;37(2):e14009. (PMID: 36285591)
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 24;16(9):e0257868. (PMID: 34559843)
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 30;15(1):e0226631. (PMID: 31999709)
Biometrics. 1990 Dec;46(4):1171-8. (PMID: 2085632)
Glob Chang Biol. 2022 Dec;28(23):7139-7153. (PMID: 36168958)

Date Created: 20241108 Date Completed: 20241108 Latest Revision: 20241116

20250114

PMC11548783

10.1371/journal.pone.0313345

39514555