Evaluating the tailored implementation of a multisite care navigation service for mental health in rural and remote Australia (The Bridging Study): protocol for a community-engaged hybrid effectiveness-implementation study.

Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101258411 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1748-5908 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 17485908 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Implement Sci Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: [London] : BioMed Central, 2006-

COVID-19*/epidemiology ; Mental Health Services*/organization & administration; Humans ; Patient Navigation/organization & administration ; Australia ; Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration ; Rural Population ; Rural Health Services/organization & administration ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Mental Disorders/therapy ; Implementation Science ; Queensland

Background: A dramatic decline in mental health of people worldwide in the early COVID-19 pandemic years has not recovered. In rural and remote Australia, access to appropriate and timely mental health services has been identified as a major barrier to people seeking help for mental ill-health. From 2020 to 2021 a care navigation model, Navicare, was co-designed with rural and remote communities in the Greater Whitsunday Region of Central Queensland in Australia. The Exploration, Preparation, Implementation and Sustainment (EPIS) framework was used to design and guide multiple aspects of a multisite study, The Bridging Study, to evaluate the implementation of Navicare in Australia.
Methods: A community-engaged hybrid effectiveness-implementation study design will focus on the tailored implementation of Navicare at three new sites as well as monitoring implementation at an existing site established since 2021. Study outcomes assessed will include sustained access as the co-primary outcome (measured using access to Navicare mental health referral services) and Proctor's Implementation Outcomes of feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, adoption, fidelity, implementation cost, and sustainability. Data collection for the implementation evaluation will include service usage data, community consultations, interviews, and workshops; analysed using mixed methods and guided by EPIS and other implementation frameworks. Pre-post effectiveness and cost-consequence study components are embedded in the implementation and sustainment phases, with comparison to pre-implementation data and value assessed for each EPIS phase using hospital, service, and resource allocation data. A scaling up strategy will be co-developed using a national roundtable forum in the final year of the study. Qualitative exploration of other aspects of the study (e.g., mechanisms of action and stakeholder engagement) will be conducted.
Discussion: Our study will use tailoring to local sites and a community-engaged approach to drive implementation of a mental health care navigation service in rural and remote Australia, with expected benefits to mental healthcare access. This approach is consistent with policy recommendations nationally and internationally as building blocks for rural health including the World Health Organization Framework for Action on Strengthening Health Systems to Improve Health Outcomes.
Trial Registration: Prospectively registered on April 2, 2024, on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, no. ACTRN12624000382572. https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=386665&isReview=true .
(© 2024. The Author(s).)

Sapien Labs. The Mental State of the World in 2023: A persepctive in Internet-Enabled Populations. 2024. https://mentalstateoftheworld.report/2023_read/ .
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Australian Government. Australian Burden of Disease Study 2023. Canberra; 2023. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/burden-of-disease/australian-burden-of-disease-study-2023/contents/summary . Accessed 27 May 2024.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. National Study of Mental Health and Wellbeing. Canberra; 2023. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/health/mental-health/national-study-mental-health-and-wellbeing/2020-2022 . Accessed 27 May 2024.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Rural & Remote Australians. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare website; 2024. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports-data/population-groups/rural-remote-australians/links-other-information#:~:text=The%20term%20'rural%20and%20remote,regional%2C%20Remote%20or%20Very%20remote . Accessed 27 May 2024.
Perkins D, Farmer J, Salvador-Carulla L, Dalton H, Luscombe G. The Orange Declaration on rural and remote mental health. Aust J Rural Health. 2019;27(5):374–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajr.12560 . (PMID: 10.1111/ajr.1256031515882)
Australian Mental Health Commission (AMHC). Submission to the accessibility and quality of mental health services in rural and remote Australia Senate Inquiry. 2018. https://www.nswmentalhealthcommission.com.au/report/accessibility-and-quality-mental-health-services-rural-and-remote-australia .
Petrie K, Baldwin P, Crawford J, Harvey SB. The voice of mental health practice in Australia: a mixed-method cross-sectional study of gaps and areas of need. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2021;45(4):318–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.13078 . (PMID: 10.1111/1753-6405.1307833617137)
Stanton MC, Ali SB, Team tSC. A typology of power in implementation: Building on the exploration, preparation, implementation, sustainment (EPIS) framework to advance mental health and HIV health equity. Implement Res Pract. 2022;3:26334895211064250. https://doi.org/10.1177/26334895211064250 . (PMID: 10.1177/26334895211064250370911059978699)
Wesley Medical Research & The Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation. Abell B, Fisher F, Tyack Z, McPhail S. Developing a new intervention for mental health services in the Bowen Basin (Phase 1): Full Project Report. Brisbane; 2020. https://www.aushsi.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Bowen-Basin-Phase-1-Report_FINAL-with-ExSum-no-costs.pdf . Accessed 27 May 2024.
Gillam M, Leach M, Gonzalez-Chica D, Jones M, Muyambi K, Walsh S, et al. Availability and quality of publicly available health workforce data sources in Australia: A scoping review protocol. BMJ Open. 2020;10(e034400).  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034400 .
Fitzpatrick SJ, Perkins D, Luland T, Brown D, Corvan E. The effect of context in rural mental health care: Understanding integrated services in a small town. Health Place. 2017;45:70–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.03.004 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.03.00428288445)
Anderson JE, Larke SC. The Sooke Navigator project: using community resources and research to improve local service for mental health and addictions. Ment Health Fam Med. 2009;6(1):21–8. (PMID: 224778842777592)
Corrigan PW, Pickett S, Batia K, Michaels PJ. Peer navigators and integrated care to address ethnic health disparities of people with serious mental illness. Soc Work Public Health. 2014;29(6):581–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/19371918.2014.893854 . (PMID: 10.1080/19371918.2014.893854251446995371355)
Harris SA, Eapen V, Kohlhoff J. Implementing a National Navigation Service for Perinatal and Infant Mental Health: Early Learnings from the ForWhen Model. Community Ment Health J. 2024;60(3):581–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-023-01211-0 . (PMID: 10.1007/s10597-023-01211-037991577)
Kangovi S, Mitra N, Norton L, Harte R, Zhao X, Carter T, et al. Effect of Community Health Worker Support on Clinical Outcomes of Low-Income Patients Across Primary Care Facilities: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178(12):1635–43. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4630 . (PMID: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4630304222246469661)
Aarons GA, Huriburt M, Horwitz SM. Advancing a conceptual model of evidence-based practice implementation in public service sectors. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. 2011;38(1):4–23. (PMID: 10.1007/s10488-010-0327-721197565)
Greater Whitsunday Region. State Development and Instrustructure, Queensland Government. 2023. Available from:  https://www.statedevelopment.qld.gov.au/regions/queenslands-regions/greater-whitsunday .
Curran GM, Landes SJ, McBain SA, Pyne JM, Smith JD, Fernandez ME, et al. Reflections on 10 years of effectiveness-implementation hybrid studies. Front Health Serv. 2022;2:1053496. https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2022.1053496 . (PMID: 10.3389/frhs.2022.10534963692581110012680)
Hawkins NG, Sanson-Fisher RW, Shakeshaft A, D’Este C, Green LW. The multiple baseline design for evaluating population-based research. Am J Prev Med. 2007;33(2):162–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2007.03.020 . (PMID: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.03.02017673105)
Holt CL, Chambers DA. Opportunities and challenges in conducting community-engaged dissemination/implementation research. Transl Behav Med. 2017;7(3):389–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-017-0520-2 . (PMID: 10.1007/s13142-017-0520-2288843055645293)
Collins SE, Clifasefi SL, Stanton J, The Leap Advisory B, Straits KJE, Gil-Kashiwabara E, et al. Community-based participatory research (CBPR): Towards equitable involvement of community in psychology research. Am Psychol. 2018;73(7):884–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000167 . (PMID: 10.1037/amp0000167293553526054913)
Jagosh J, Macaulay AC, Pluye P, Salsberg J, Bush PL, Henderson J, et al. Uncovering the benefits of participatory research: implications of a realist review for health research and practice. Milbank Q. 2012;90(2):311–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2012.00665.x . (PMID: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2012.00665.x227093903460206)
Moullin JC, Dickson KS, Stadnick NA, Rabin B, Aarons GA. Systematic review of the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework. Implement Sci. 2019;14(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0842-6 . (PMID: 10.1186/s13012-018-0842-6306113026321673)
Olakunde BO, Itanyi IU, Olawepo JO, Liu L, Bembir C, Idemili-Aronu N, et al. Comparative effectiveness of implementation strategies for Accelerating Cervical Cancer Elimination through the integration of Screen-and-treat Services (ACCESS study): protocol for a cluster randomized hybrid type III trial in Nigeria. Implement Sci. 2024;19(1):25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-024-01349-9 . (PMID: 10.1186/s13012-024-01349-93846826610926605)
Beeber L, Ledford A, Gasbarro M, Zeanah P, Knudtson M, Sprinkle S, et al. Developing a multicomponent implementation strategy for mental health interventions within the Nurse-Family Partnership: An application of the EPIS framework. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2022;54(4):445–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12755 . (PMID: 10.1111/jnu.1275534904787)
Becan JE, Bartkowski JP, Knight DK, Wiley TRA, DiClemente R, Ducharme L, et al. A model for rigorously applying the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework in the design and measurement of a large scale collaborative multi-site study. Health Justice. 2018;6(1):9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-018-0068-3 . (PMID: 10.1186/s40352-018-0068-3296545185899075)
Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, Bunger A, et al. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011;38(2):65–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7 . (PMID: 10.1007/s10488-010-0319-720957426)
Proctor EK, Bunger AC, Lengnick-Hall R, Gerke DR, Martin JK, Phillips RJ, et al. Ten years of implementation outcomes research: a scoping review. Implement Sci. 2023;18(1):31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-023-01286-z . (PMID: 10.1186/s13012-023-01286-z3749124210367273)
Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press; 2003.
Wiltsey Stirman S, Baumann AA, Miller CJ. The FRAME: an expanded framework for reporting adaptations and modifications to evidence-based interventions. Implement Sci. 2019;14(1):58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-019-0898-y . (PMID: 10.1186/s13012-019-0898-y311710146554895)
Miller CJ, Barnett ML, Baumann AA, Gutner CA, Wiltsey-Stirman S. The FRAME-IS: a framework for documenting modifications to implementation strategies in healthcare. Implement Sci. 2021;16(1):36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01105-3 . (PMID: 10.1186/s13012-021-01105-3338277168024675)
WHO. Nine steps for developing a scaling-up strategy. France: World Health Organisation WHO; 2010. p. 41 https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241500319 .
Gogovor A, Zomahoun HTV, Ben Charif A, Ekanmian G, Moher D, McLean RKD, et al. Informing the development of the SUCCEED reporting guideline for studies on the scaling of health interventions: A systematic review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024;103(7): e37079. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000037079 . (PMID: 10.1097/md.000000000003707938363902)
Palinkas LA, Mendon SJ, Hamilton AB. Innovations in Mixed Methods Evaluations. Annual Review of Public Health. 2019;Volume 40, 2019(40):423–42. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040218-044215 . (PMID: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040218-044215)
Fishman KN, Levitt AJ, Markoulakis R, Weingust S. Satisfaction with Mental Health Navigation Services: Piloting an Evaluation with a New Scale. Community Ment Health J. 2018;54(5):521–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-017-0201-0 . (PMID: 10.1007/s10597-017-0201-029147951)
Luke DA, Calhoun A, Robichaux CB, Elliott MB, Moreland-Russell S. The Program Sustainability Assessment Tool: A New Instrument for Public Health Programs. Prev Chronic Dis. 2014;11:E12. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd11.130184 . (PMID: 10.5888/pcd11.130184244566453900326)
Yakovchenko V, Rogal SS, Goodrich DE, Lamorte C, Neely B, Merante M, et al. Getting to implementation: Adaptation of an implementation playbook. Front Public Health. 2023;10: 980958. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.980958 . (PMID: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.980958366848769853037)
Chamberlain P, Brown CH, Saldana L. Observational measure of implementation progress in community based settings: The Stages of implementation completion (SIC). Implement Sci. 2011;6(1):116. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-116 . (PMID: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-116219749143197550)
Finley EP, Huynh AK, Farmer MM, Bean-Mayberry B, Moin T, Oishi SM, et al. Periodic reflections: a method of guided discussions for documenting implementation phenomena. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18(1):153. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0610-y . (PMID: 10.1186/s12874-018-0610-y304821596258449)
Cohen DJ, Leviton LC, Isaacson N, Tallia AF, Crabtree BF. Online Diaries for Qualitative Evaluation: Gaining Real-Time Insights. Am J Eval. 2006;27(2):163–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214006288448 . (PMID: 10.1177/1098214006288448)
Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–81. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.01018929686)
Mielke J, De Geest S, Zúñiga F, Brunkert T, Zullig LL, Pfadenhauer LM, et al. Understanding dynamic complexity in context-Enriching contextual analysis in implementation science from a constructivist perspective. Front Health Serv. 2022;2: 953731. https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2022.953731 . (PMID: 10.3389/frhs.2022.9537313692584710012673)
Charmaz K. Constructing Grounded Theory. 2nd ed. London: SAGE; 2014.
Simmons R, Shiffman J. Scaling up health service innovations: a framework for action. In: Simmons R, Fajans P, Ghiron L, editors. Scaling up health service delivery: from pilot innovations to policies and programmes. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2007. p. 1–30.
Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13(1):117. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-117 . (PMID: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117240472043848812)
Holtrop JS, Gurfinkel D, Nederveld A, Phimphasone-Brady P, Hosokawa P, Rubinson C, et al. Methods for capturing and analyzing adaptations: implications for implementation research. Implement Sci. 2022;17(1):51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-022-01218-3 . (PMID: 10.1186/s13012-022-01218-3359066029335955)
Greene JC, Caracelli VJ, Graham WF. Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs. Educ Eval Policy Anal. 1989;11(3):255–74. https://doi.org/10.2307/1163620 . (PMID: 10.2307/1163620)
Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE; 2018.
Charmaz K, Thornberg R. The pursuit of quality in grounded theory. Qual Res Psychol. 2020;18:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1780357 . (PMID: 10.1080/14780887.2020.1780357)
Salvati ZM, Rahm AK, Williams MS, Ladd I, Schlieder V, Atondo J, et al. A picture is worth a thousand words: advancing the use of visualization tools in implementation science through process mapping and matrix heat mapping. Implementation Science Communications. 2023;4(1):43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-023-00424-4 . (PMID: 10.1186/s43058-023-00424-43709860210127322)
Kim B, Cruden G, Crable EL, Quanbeck A, Mittman BS, Wagner AD. A structured approach to applying systems analysis methods for examining implementation mechanisms. Implementation Science Communications. 2023;4(1):127. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-023-00504-5 . (PMID: 10.1186/s43058-023-00504-53785821510588196)
Glegg SMN, Jenkins E, Kothari A. How the study of networks informs knowledge translation and implementation: a scoping review. Implement Sci. 2019;14(1):34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-019-0879-1 . (PMID: 10.1186/s13012-019-0879-1309178446437864)
Powell BJ, Waltz TJ, Chinman MJ, Damschroder LJ, Smith JL, Matthieu MM, et al. A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project. Implement Sci. 2015;10:21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0209-1 . (PMID: 10.1186/s13012-015-0209-1258891994328074)
Dobson AJ, Barnett AG. An Introduction to Generalized Linear Models. 4th ed. New York: CRC Press; 2018. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315182780 . (PMID: 10.1201/9781315182780)
Hartfiel N, Edwards RT. Cost–consequence analysis of public health interventions. In: Edwards RT, McIntosh E, editors. Applied Health Economics for Public Health Practice and Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780198737483.003.0010 .
Donovan T, Abell A, McPhail S, Carter H. Development of Cost-IS (costing implementation strategies) instrument for digital health solutions: a modified e-Delphi study. 2024. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4229774/v1 . Accessed 12 Jul 2024.
Mates in Mining: Mates in Construction (website). Available from: https://mates.org.au/mining/research . Accessed 12 July 2024.
Jagosh J, Bush PL, Salsberg J, Macaulay AC, Greenhalgh T, Wong G, et al. A realist evaluation of community-based participatory research: partnership synergy, trust building and related ripple effects. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):725. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1949-1 . (PMID: 10.1186/s12889-015-1949-1262235234520009)
Wallerstein N, Duran B. Community-based participatory research contributions to intervention research: the intersection of science and practice to improve health equity. Am J Public Health. 2010;100 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S40–6. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2009.184036 . (PMID: 10.2105/ajph.2009.18403620147663)
Rush KL, Singh S, Seaton CL, Burton L, Li E, Jones C, et al. Telehealth Use for Enhancing the Health of Rural Older Adults: A Systematic Mixed Studies Review. Gerontologist. 2022;62(10):e564–77. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnab141 . (PMID: 10.1093/geront/gnab14134661675)
Snoswell CL, Chelberg G, De Guzman KR, Haydon HH, Thomas EE, Caffery LJ, et al. The clinical effectiveness of telehealth: A systematic review of meta-analyses from 2010 to 2019. J Telemed Telecare. 2023;29(9):669–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633x211022907 . (PMID: 10.1177/1357633x21102290734184580)
Iorfino F, Occhipinti J-A, Skinner A, Davenport T, Rowe S, Prodan A, et al. The Impact of Technology-Enabled Care Coordination in a Complex Mental Health System: A Local System Dynamics Model. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(6):e25331-e. https://doi.org/10.2196/25331 . (PMID: 10.2196/25331)
NMHC. National Mental Health Commission (NMHC) AG. National Mental Health Commission Vision 2030. 2022.
Fitzpatrick SJ, Handley T, Powell N, Read D, Inder KJ, Perkins D, et al. Suicide in rural Australia: A retrospective study of mental health problems, health-seeking and service utilisation. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(7): e0245271. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245271 . (PMID: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245271342889098294514)
Fisher OJ, McGrath K, Grogan C, Cockshaw W, Leggatt-Cook C. Care navigation addresses issues of tele-mental health acceptability and uptake in rural and remote Australian communities. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(4): e0298655. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0298655 . (PMID: 10.1371/journal.pone.02986553857411010994303)
Stockton DA, Fowler C, Debono D, Travaglia J. World Health Organization building blocks in rural community health services: An integrative review. Health Sci Rep. 2021;4(2): e254. https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.254 . (PMID: 10.1002/hsr2.254337328947942400)
WHO. Everybody business : strengthening health systems to improve health outcomes : WHO’s framework for action. Geneve, Switzerland: WHO Document Production Services; 2007. p. 44 https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/everybody-s-business----strengthening-health-systems-to-improve-health-outcomes .
Xie CX, Sun L, Ingram E, De Simoni A, Eldridge S, Pinnock H, et al. Use of routine healthcare data in randomised implementation trials: a methodological mixed-methods systematic review. Implement Sci. 2023;18(1):47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-023-01300-4 . (PMID: 10.1186/s13012-023-01300-43778409910544368)
Garland AF, Kruse M, Aarons GA. Clinicians and outcome measurement: What’s the use? J Behav Health Serv Res. 2003;30(4):393–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02287427 . (PMID: 10.1007/BF0228742714593663)

Keywords: Adaptation; Australia; Community engagement; EPIS framework; Hybrid effectiveness-implementation design; Implementation study; Mental health; Participatory methods; Rural and remote; Scaling-up

Date Created: 20240905 Date Completed: 20240905 Latest Revision: 20240905

20240905

10.1186/s13012-024-01391-7

39232820