Comparative analysis of internal fixation modalities for PER type IV ankle fractures: a finite element study.

Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101265112 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1749-799X (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 1749799X NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Orthop Surg Res Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: London : BioMed Central, 2006-

Finite Element Analysis* ; Ankle Fractures*/surgery ; Ankle Fractures*/diagnostic imaging ; Fracture Fixation, Internal*/methods ; Fracture Fixation, Internal*/instrumentation; Humans ; Male ; Adult ; Bone Plates ; Bone Screws ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Ankle Joint/surgery ; Ankle Joint/diagnostic imaging ; Ankle Joint/physiopathology

Background: There are many options for the surgical treatment of pronation external rotation (PER) type IV ankle fractures, including the use of fibular plates and screws, the aim of this study was to investigate the biomechanical stability and safety of different internal fixation methods for PER type IV ankle fractures via finite element analysis.
Methods: A three-dimensional finite element model of the ankle joint and the whole foot of a healthy 26-years-old adult male was established and validated based on computed tomography images of his lower limb, and a computer-aided design was used to produce a PER type IV ankle fracture and plate and screw model. Four different internal fixation modes were simulated, including a (all ankle fixation-utilizing a fibular plate and screws for comprehensive stabilization of the ankle), b (inferior tibiofibular joint fixation + all ankle fixation), c (inferior tibiofibular joint fixation + unfixed anterior ankle), and d (inferior tibiofibular joint fixation + unfixed anterior and posterior ankles). The results of the four different fixation methods were compared via finite element analysis, and the von Mises stresses. The displacements of the four different fixation methods were analyzed as the output indices.
Results: There were no significant differences between the results of using fibular plates and screws and the displacement of fracture breaks among the four internal fixation modalities. The von Mises stress in the tibiotalar joint, median ankle, posterior ankle, and anterior ankle was minimized in the working condition of d, d, b, and d respectively. The von Mises stress in the fibular plate and screws was minimized in the working condition of a. The von Mises stress in the distal fibula was minimized in the working condition of a. However, the stress was mainly concentrated at the attachment point of the inferior tibiofibular anterior ligament, and in the working condition with inferior tibiofibular joint fixation, the stress was significantly concentrated in the inferior tibiofibular joint screw in all the fibular plates and screws.
Conclusions: The results of this study demonstrate the feasibility of using finite element analysis to compare the biomechanical stability and safety of four configurations of fibular plates and screws for treating PER type IV ankle fractures. All four modalities provided comparable biomechanical stability and safety, showing no significant differences. However, the current limitations of the finite element analysis methodology preclude specific clinical inferences. Further refinement of the methodology in future studies is necessary to enable reliable clinical applications.
(© 2024. The Author(s).)

J Foot Ankle Surg. 2007 Nov-Dec;46(6):456-63. (PMID: 17980843)
Foot Ankle Int. 2019 Jul;40(7):790-796. (PMID: 30971114)
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998 Mar;(348):269-81. (PMID: 9553561)
Foot Ankle Int. 2015 Jun;36(6):641-7. (PMID: 25690442)
J Orthop Trauma. 1992;6(1):96-101. (PMID: 1556631)
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Jan 4;18(1):10. (PMID: 36600304)
Acta Orthop Scand. 1998 Feb;69(1):48-50. (PMID: 9524518)
Chin Med J (Engl). 2018 Nov 05;131(21):2551-2557. (PMID: 30381588)
Arch Surg (1920). 1950 May;60(5):957-85. (PMID: 15411319)
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Aug 8;14(1):254. (PMID: 31395080)
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991 Mar;73(3):347-51. (PMID: 2002072)
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Dec 21;23(1):1112. (PMID: 36544111)
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Feb 11;15(1):45. (PMID: 32046746)
Int Orthop. 2019 Nov;43(11):2539-2547. (PMID: 31440891)
J Biomech. 2005 May;38(5):1045-54. (PMID: 15797586)
Foot Ankle Int. 2014 Apr;35(4):353-9. (PMID: 24459203)
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995 Nov;(320):182-7. (PMID: 7586825)
World J Orthop. 2022 Feb 18;13(2):131-138. (PMID: 35317400)
J Biomech. 2002 May;35(5):629-37. (PMID: 11955502)
Comput Biol Med. 2021 Aug;135:104598. (PMID: 34346320)
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Jun;447:165-71. (PMID: 16467626)
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Jul 27;58(8):. (PMID: 36013472)
Foot Ankle Int. 2011 Apr;32(4):385-93. (PMID: 21733441)
Orthop Surg. 2022 Oct;14(10):2701-2710. (PMID: 36098492)
Foot Ankle Surg. 2019 Aug;25(4):409-417. (PMID: 30321968)
Injury. 2021 Oct;52(10):3143-3149. (PMID: 34246483)
Biomed Tech (Berl). 2010 Oct;55(5):265-71. (PMID: 20840008)

Keywords: Ankle fracture; Biomechanics; Finite element analysis; Internal fixation

Date Created: 20240823 Date Completed: 20240824 Latest Revision: 20240826

20240826

PMC11342527

10.1186/s13018-024-05021-2

39180103