Modeling the population health impact of accurate and inaccurate perceptions of harm from nicotine.

Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101153624 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1477-7517 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14777517 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Harm Reduct J Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: [London] : BioMed Central, c2004-

Nicotine*/adverse effects; Humans ; Male ; Female ; Adult ; Middle Aged ; Population Health ; Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems ; Smoking Cessation/psychology ; United States/epidemiology ; Tobacco, Smokeless ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Young Adult ; Adolescent ; Aged

Background: Scientific evidence clearly demonstrates that inhaling the smoke from the combustion of cigarettes is responsible for most of the harm caused by smoking, and not the nicotine. However, a majority of U.S. adults who smoke inaccurately believe that nicotine causes cancer which may be a significant barrier, preventing switching to potentially reduced risk, non-combustible products like electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) and smokeless tobacco (ST). We assessed the population health impact associated with nicotine perceptions.
Methods: Using a previously validated agent-based model to the U.S. population, we analyzed nationally representative data from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study to estimate base case rates of sustained (maintained over four waves) cessation and switching to non-combustible product use, by sex. Nicotine perception scenarios were determined from PATH data. The overall switch rate from smoking in Wave 4 to non-combustible product use in Wave 5 (3.94%) was stratified based on responses to the nicotine perception question "Do you believe nicotine is the chemical that causes most of the cancer caused by smoking cigarettes?", (four-item scale from "Definitely not" to "Definitely yes"). The relative percent change between the overall and stratified rates, corresponding to each item, was used to adjust the base case rates of switching, to determine the impact, if all adults who smoke exhibited switching behaviors based on responses to the nicotine perceptions question. The public health impact of nicotine perceptions was estimated as the difference in all-cause mortality between the base case and the four nicotine perception scenarios.
Results: Switch rates associated with those who responded, "Definitely not" (8.39%) resulted in a net benefit of preventing nearly 800,000 premature deaths over an 85-year period. Conversely switch rates reflective of those who responded, "Definitely yes" (2.59%) resulted in a net harm of nearly 300,000 additional premature deaths over the same period.
Conclusions: Accurate knowledge regarding the role of nicotine is associated with higher switch rates and prevention of premature deaths. Our findings suggest that promoting public education to correct perceptions of harm from nicotine has the potential to benefit public health.
(© 2024. The Author(s).)

Risk Anal. 2012 Jul;32 Suppl 1:S14-24. (PMID: 22882884)
Addiction. 2008 Aug;103(8):1371-8. (PMID: 18855827)
Stat Med. 1989 Jul;8(7):845-59. (PMID: 2772444)
Nicotine Tob Res. 2022 Oct 26;24(11):1727-1731. (PMID: 35486922)
Tob Control. 2017 Jul;26(4):371-378. (PMID: 27507901)
Int J Drug Policy. 2016 Jun;32:17-23. (PMID: 27209528)
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Nov 20;169(10):684-693. (PMID: 30304504)
BMC Public Health. 2022 Sep 19;22(1):1771. (PMID: 36123722)
Nicotine Tob Res. 2006 Jun;8(3):435-46. (PMID: 16801301)
Tob Control. 2006 Jun;15 Suppl 3:iii65-70. (PMID: 16754949)
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008 Nov 14;57(45):1226-8. (PMID: 19008791)
Nicotine Tob Res. 2004 Dec;6 Suppl 3:S303-10. (PMID: 15799593)
Nicotine Tob Res. 2019 Jan 1;21(1):41-47. (PMID: 29617887)
Eur Addict Res. 2014;20(5):218-25. (PMID: 24714502)
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 27;10(3):e0121008. (PMID: 25815840)
Harm Reduct J. 2019 Apr 11;16(1):27. (PMID: 30975137)
Nicotine Tob Res. 2023 May 22;25(6):1212-1214. (PMID: 36702774)
Addiction. 2009 Dec;104(12):2088-99. (PMID: 19922574)
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 23;8(3):e019169. (PMID: 29574440)
Am J Public Health. 2020 Nov;110(11):1644-1645. (PMID: 33026853)
Harm Reduct J. 2011 Aug 23;8:21. (PMID: 21859499)
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 09;16(7):. (PMID: 30970571)
Tob Control. 2021 Feb 25;:. (PMID: 33632809)
Nicotine Tob Res. 2022 Apr 28;24(6):855-863. (PMID: 34850185)
Int J Forecast. 1992 Nov;8(3):393-411. (PMID: 12157866)
Nicotine Tob Res. 2021 Feb 16;23(3):426-437. (PMID: 32496514)
Tob Control. 2018 Jan;27(1):18-25. (PMID: 28970328)
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Mar 18;71(11):397-405. (PMID: 35298455)
Addiction. 2019 May;114(5):879-888. (PMID: 30609154)
Nicotine Tob Res. 2019 Dec 23;21(Suppl 1):S88-S90. (PMID: 31867645)
Epidemiology. 2016 Nov;27(6):819-26. (PMID: 27093020)
Prev Med. 2017 Mar;96:94-100. (PMID: 28034733)
Nicotine Tob Res. 2004 Dec;6 Suppl 3:S333-40. (PMID: 15799596)

Keywords: Misperceptions; Nicotine perceptions; Population modeling; Public health impact; Tobacco harm reduction

6M3C89ZY6R (Nicotine)

Date Created: 20240809 Date Completed: 20240810 Latest Revision: 20240825

20240826

PMC11312148

10.1186/s12954-024-01059-x

39123205