Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Continuous adductor canal block versus continuous femoral nerve block for postoperative pain in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • المصدر:
      Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1932-6203 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19326203 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS One Subsets: MEDLINE
    • بيانات النشر:
      Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science
    • الموضوع:
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      Continuous adductor canal block (CACB) is almost a pure sensory nerve block and can provide effective analgesia without blocking the motor branch of the femoral nerve. Thus, the objective of this study was to systematically evaluate the efficacy of CACB versus continuous femoral nerve block (CFNB) on analgesia and functional activities in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty. PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (from inception to 3 October 2023) were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared CACB with CFNB in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty. Registration in the PROSPERO International prospective register of the meta-analysis was completed, prior to initiation of the study (registration number: CRD42022363756). Two independent reviewers selected the studies, extracted data and evaluated risk of bias by quality assessment. Revman 5.4 software was used for meta-analysis and the summary effect measure were calculated by mean differences and 95% confidence intervals. Eleven studies with a total of 748 patients were finally included. Pooled analysis suggested that both CACB and CFNB showed the same degree of pain relief at rest and at motion at 12 h, 24 h and 48 h in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty. Compared with CFNB, CACB preserved the quadriceps muscle strength better (P<0.05) and significantly shortened the discharge readiness time (P<0.05). In addition, there was no significant difference in opioid consumption, knee extension and flexion, timed up and go (TUG) test, or risk of falls between the two groups. Thus, Compared with CFNB, CACB has similar effects on pain relief both at rest and at motion and opioid consumption for patients undergoing knee arthroplasty, while CACB is better than CFNB in preserving quadriceps muscle strength and shortening the discharge readiness time.
      Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
      (Copyright: © 2024 Gong et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)
    • References:
      Anesth Analg. 2018 Jul;127(1):224-227. (PMID: 29239954)
      Br J Anaesth. 2019 Sep;123(3):360-367. (PMID: 31056239)
      J Orthop Res. 2005 Sep;23(5):1083-90. (PMID: 16140191)
      Cureus. 2022 Mar 6;14(3):e22904. (PMID: 35265438)
      Anesthesiology. 2013 Feb;118(2):409-15. (PMID: 23241723)
      Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Aug 26;101(34):e30110. (PMID: 36042669)
      Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Sep-Oct;40(5):559-67. (PMID: 26115189)
      Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013 Nov-Dec;38(6):526-32. (PMID: 24121608)
      J Arthroplasty. 2014 Nov;29(11):2224-9. (PMID: 25041873)
      Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2017 Feb 18;49(1):142-7. (PMID: 28203021)
      Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Jun;105(4):633-637. (PMID: 30928275)
      Anesth Analg. 2010 Dec;111(6):1552-4. (PMID: 20889937)
      J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Oct-Dec;34(4):433-438. (PMID: 30774223)
      Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2018 Mar 19;9:2151458518756190. (PMID: 29581910)
      Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Nov;98(48):e18056. (PMID: 31770220)
      Chin Med J (Engl). 2014;127(23):4077-81. (PMID: 25430452)
      BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. (PMID: 33782057)
      Anesth Analg. 2016 May;122(5):1696-703. (PMID: 27007076)
      Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017 Oct;34(10):665-672. (PMID: 28767456)
      BMC Anesthesiol. 2018 Dec 19;18(1):191. (PMID: 30567487)
      Int J Epidemiol. 2002 Feb;31(1):150-3. (PMID: 11914311)
      Anesthesiology. 2010 Nov;113(5):1014-5. (PMID: 20881593)
      Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 Mar;136(3):397-406. (PMID: 26754752)
      Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Sep;98(39):e17358. (PMID: 31574881)
      Anesthesiology. 2015 Aug;123(2):444-56. (PMID: 26079800)
    • الموضوع:
      Date Created: 20240801 Date Completed: 20240801 Latest Revision: 20240803
    • الموضوع:
      20240803
    • الرقم المعرف:
      PMC11293650
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.1371/journal.pone.0306249
    • الرقم المعرف:
      39088521