Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Successes and challenges of partnership working to tackle health inequalities using collaborative approaches to community-based research: mixed methods analysis of focus group evidence.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • المصدر:
      Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101147692 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1475-9276 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14759276 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Int J Equity Health Subsets: MEDLINE
    • بيانات النشر:
      Original Publication: [London] : BioMed Central, 2002-
    • الموضوع:
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      Background: The concept of collaborative approaches involves community residents in joint decision-making processes to maintain or enhance their material and social conditions. During COVID-19, public services saw the benefits of actively collaborating with communities and involving residents in decision-making processes. As communities have resources and assets, they are well-placed to contribute to developing local health and wellbeing initiatives. An interdisciplinary and nationally funded three-phase research programme, "Mobilising community assets to tackle health inequalities", was established with the objective of utilising local, cultural, and natural assets to support health and wellbeing. The current study aimed to synthesise evidence collected by research teams awarded funding in phase one of the programme, comprising academic and non-academic, health and social care, voluntary and community partners.
      Methods: Ten online focus groups were conducted with research teams from across the UK exploring the successes and challenges of partnership working to tackle health inequalities using collaborative approaches to community-based research. Eight focus group questions were split between partnership working and health inequalities.
      Results: Thematic and content analysis produced 185 subthemes from which 12 themes were identified. Major themes representing an above average number of coded responses were research evidence; funding; relationships with partners; health inequalities and deprivation; community involvement; and health service and integrated care systems. Minor themes were link workers and social prescribing; training and support; place-based factors; longevity of programmes; setting up and scaling up programmes; and mental health.
      Conclusions: Successes included employing practice-based and arts-based methods, being part of a research project for those not normally involved in research, sharing funding democratically, building on established relationships, and the vital role that local assets play in involving communities. Challenges involved a lack of sustainable financial support, the short-term nature of funding, inconsistencies in reaching the poorest people, obtaining the right sort of research evidence, making sufficient research progress, building relationships with already over-burdened health care staff, and redressing the balance of power in favour of communities. Despite the challenges, participants were mainly optimistic that collective approaches and meaningful co-production would create opportunities for future research partnerships with communities.
      (© 2024. The Author(s).)
    • References:
      J Transl Med. 2004 Jan 31;2(1):5. (PMID: 14754464)
      Prev Chronic Dis. 2007 Jul;4(3):A70. (PMID: 17572974)
      Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 14;19(8):. (PMID: 35457644)
      Am J Public Health. 2010 Apr 1;100 Suppl 1:S40-6. (PMID: 20147663)
      Prev Chronic Dis. 2013 May 16;10:E78. (PMID: 23680507)
      Health Serv Res. 2012 Jun;47(3 Pt 2):1363-86. (PMID: 22353031)
      Health Promot Int. 2019 Apr 1;34(2):356-366. (PMID: 29206912)
      Am Psychol. 2018 Oct;73(7):884-898. (PMID: 29355352)
      J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2012 Nov;23(4):1527-35. (PMID: 23698667)
      Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 27;18(11):. (PMID: 34072002)
      Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 04;11:1286479. (PMID: 38239795)
      Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Apr 2;20(1):36. (PMID: 35366898)
      Int J Equity Health. 2021 Nov 24;20(1):249. (PMID: 34819080)
      Prev Chronic Dis. 2004 Jan;1(1):A12. (PMID: 15634374)
      J High Educ Outreach Engagem. 2016;20(2):55-84. (PMID: 28184179)
      Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 30;19(7):. (PMID: 35409769)
      BMC Public Health. 2021 Oct 19;21(1):1888. (PMID: 34666742)
      Int J Prev Med. 2012 Jun;3(6):386-93. (PMID: 22783464)
      Health Educ Behav. 2020 Aug;47(4):556-568. (PMID: 31619072)
      WMJ. 2004;103(2):15-9. (PMID: 15139553)
    • Grant Information:
      UKRI/AHRC: AH/W006405/1 UK Research and Innovation/Arts and Humanities Research Council
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: Communities; Community assets; Community-based participatory research; Focus groups; Health inequalities; Integrated care; Mixed methods; Partnership; Scalability; Sustainability
    • الموضوع:
      Date Created: 20240704 Date Completed: 20240705 Latest Revision: 20240707
    • الموضوع:
      20240707
    • الرقم المعرف:
      PMC11223342
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.1186/s12939-024-02216-1
    • الرقم المعرف:
      38965627