Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Combining sentiment analysis and text mining with content analysis of farm vet interviews on mental wellbeing in livestock practice.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • المصدر:
      Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1932-6203 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19326203 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS One Subsets: MEDLINE
    • بيانات النشر:
      Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science
    • الموضوع:
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      Background: The aim of the How Farm Vets Cope project was to co-design, with farm veterinary surgeons, a set of web-based resources to help them and others deal with the different situations that they can face. As part of the wider project, participants were recruited for one-to-one semi-structured phone interviews. These interviews focused on elements of job satisfaction and how the participants coped during periods of poor mental wellbeing or with setbacks and failure.
      Methods: Transcripts of these interviews were analysed using both quantitative methods of sentiment analysis and text mining, including term frequency/inverse document frequency and rapid automated keyword extraction, and qualitative content analysis. The twin aims of the analysis were identifying the important themes discussed by the participants and comparing the results of the two methods to see what differences, if any, arose.
      Results: Analysis using the afinn and nrc sentiment lexicons identified emotional themes of anticipation and trust. Rapid automated keyword extraction highlighted issues around age of vets and support, whilst using term frequency/inverse document frequency allowed for individual themes, such as religion, not present across all responses, to be identified. Content analysis supported these findings, pinpointing examples of trust around relationships with farmers and more experienced vets, along with some examples of the difference good support networks can make, particularly to younger vets.
      Findings: This work has confirmed previous results in identifying the themes of trust, communication and support to be integral to the experience of practicing farm veterinary surgeons. Younger or less experienced vets recognised themselves as benefiting from further support and signposting, leading to a discussion around the preparation of veterinary students for entry into a farm animal vet practice. The two different approaches taken showed very good agreement in their results. The quantitative approaches can be scaled to allow a larger number of interviews to be utilised in studies whilst still allowing the important qualitative results to be identified.
      Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
      (Copyright: © 2024 Duncan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)
    • References:
      Vet Rec. 2010 Mar 27;166(13):388-97. (PMID: 20348468)
      Behav Res Methods. 2019 Aug;51(4):1766-1781. (PMID: 30941697)
      BMC Vet Res. 2021 Sep 6;17(1):294. (PMID: 34488757)
      Vet Rec. 2015 Jun 20;176(25):655. (PMID: 26002092)
      Res Nurs Health. 2007 Feb;30(1):99-111. (PMID: 17243111)
      Nurs Health Sci. 2013 Sep;15(3):398-405. (PMID: 23480423)
      J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2019 May 15;254(10):1204-1217. (PMID: 31039097)
      Res Vet Sci. 2022 Nov;148:27-32. (PMID: 35644090)
      Vet Rec. 2015 Mar 14;176(11):276-80. (PMID: 25779526)
      Animal. 2021 Jan;15(1):100058. (PMID: 33516010)
      Equine Vet J. 2017 Jul;49(4):425-432. (PMID: 27589226)
      Aust Vet J. 2011 Nov;89(11):460-8. (PMID: 22008127)
      Vet Rec. 2021 Oct;189(8):e455. (PMID: 34008234)
      PLoS One. 2017 Mar 3;12(3):e0171380. (PMID: 28257511)
      Prev Vet Med. 2016 May 1;127:84-93. (PMID: 27094145)
      Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2022;9(3):126-134. (PMID: 35911089)
      Aust Vet J. 2019 Oct;97(10):382-389. (PMID: 31364771)
      Can Vet J. 2013 Aug;54(8):790-1. (PMID: 24155482)
      J Vet Med Educ. 2015 Fall;42(3):184-93. (PMID: 26075621)
      J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jun 29;20(6):e231. (PMID: 29959110)
      Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57. (PMID: 17872937)
      Int J Nurs Stud. 2004 Feb;41(2):141-50. (PMID: 14725778)
      Ir Vet J. 2022 Jun 21;75(1):15. (PMID: 35729648)
      Prev Vet Med. 2019 Jun 1;167:61-67. (PMID: 31027723)
      Am J Ind Med. 2003 Jul;44(1):46-57. (PMID: 12822135)
      Vet Rec. 2020 May 2;186(15):486-488. (PMID: 32358116)
      Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2012 Feb;47(2):223-40. (PMID: 21181111)
    • الموضوع:
      Date Created: 20240522 Date Completed: 20240522 Latest Revision: 20240524
    • الموضوع:
      20240524
    • الرقم المعرف:
      PMC11111023
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.1371/journal.pone.0304090
    • الرقم المعرف:
      38776300