Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Extra-peritoneal vs. Trans-peritoneal Radical Cystectomy pros and cons.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • المؤلفون: Allameh F;Allameh F; Eslami AH; Eslami AH
  • المصدر:
    Urology journal [Urol J] 2024 Jun 09; Vol. 21 (4), pp. 271. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jun 09.
  • نوع النشر :
    Comparative Study; Letter; Journal Article
  • اللغة:
    English
  • معلومة اضافية
    • المصدر:
      Publisher: Urology and Nephrology Research Center Country of Publication: Iran NLM ID: 101286676 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1735-546X (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 17351308 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Urol J Subsets: MEDLINE
    • بيانات النشر:
      Original Publication: Tehran : Urology and Nephrology Research Center
    • الموضوع:
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      One of the most common cancers of the urinary tract is bladder tumors. Bladder cancers are divided into two groups: non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and muscle-invasive bladder cancer. (1)  Trans-Peritoneal  Radical Cystectomy (RC) with  pelvic lymphadenectomy is the standard technique in muscle invasive and high risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (2). and Urologist around the world are more familiar with trans-peritoneal technique. In some articles extra-peritoneal Radical Cystectomy (RC) implied as an decreased  postoperative  complications techniques. In this letter we want to compare these two techniques and find out the pros and cons of these techniques.
    • الموضوع:
      Date Created: 20240508 Date Completed: 20240616 Latest Revision: 20240616
    • الموضوع:
      20240616
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.22037/uj.v20i.8140
    • الرقم المعرف:
      38716611