Comparison of quality and interpretation of newborn ultrasound screening examinations for developmental dysplasia of the hip by basically trained nurses and junior physicians with no previous ultrasound experience.

Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1932-6203 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19326203 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS One Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science

Hip Dislocation, Congenital*/diagnostic imaging ; Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip*; Infant ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Ultrasonography/methods ; Neonatal Screening/methods ; Hip Joint/diagnostic imaging

Background: We are obliged to give babies the chance to profit from a nationwide screening of developmental dysplasia of the hip in very rural areas of Mongolia, where trained physicians are scarce. This study aimed to compare the quality and interpretation of hip ultrasound screening examinations performed by nurses and junior physicians.
Methods: A group of 6 nurses and 6 junior physician volunteers with no previous ultrasound experience underwent Graf's standard training in hands-on practice. Newborns were examined before discharge from the hospital, according to the national guideline. Two standard documentation images of each hip were saved digitally. The groups were compared on the proportion of good quality of sonograms and correct interpretation. Two Swiss supervisors' agreed diagnosis according to Graf was considered the final reference for the study purposes.
Results: A total of 201 newborns (402 hips or 804 sonograms) were examined in the study, with a mean age of 1.3±0.8 days at examination. Junior physicians examined 100 newborns (200 hips or 400 sonograms), while nurses examined 101 newborns (202 hips or 404 sonograms). The study subjects of the two groups were well balanced for the distribution of baseline characteristics. The study observed no statistically significant difference in the quality of Graf's standard plane images between the providers. Eventually, 92.0% (92) of the physician group and 89.1% (90) of the nurse group were correctly diagnosed as "Group A" (Graf's Type 1 hip) or "Non-Group A" hips (p = 0.484). The most common errors among the groups were a missing lower limb, wrong measurement lines, and technical problems.
Conclusion: Our study provides evidence that while there might be a trend of slightly more technical mistakes in the nurse group, the overall diagnosis accuracy is similar to junior physicians after receiving standard training in Graf's hip ultrasound method. However, after basic training, regular quality control is a must and all participants should receive refresher trainings. More specifically, nurses need training in the identification of anatomical structures.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
(Copyright: © 2024 Ulziibat et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

World J Orthop. 2015 Dec 18;6(11):886-901. (PMID: 26716085)
Australas Emerg Care. 2018 Nov;21(4):121-130. (PMID: 30998887)
Pediatrics. 2006 Mar;117(3):e557-76. (PMID: 16510634)
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Aug;93(8):1126-30. (PMID: 21768641)
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1964 Mar-Apr;33:119-28. (PMID: 5889015)
Indian J Orthop. 2011 Nov;45(6):553-7. (PMID: 22144750)
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 24;8(10):e79427. (PMID: 24205385)
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2013 Mar;45(1):25-33. (PMID: 23368429)
Acta Orthop Belg. 2013 Feb;79(1):60-3. (PMID: 23547517)
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1994 Nov-Dec;132(6):502-4. (PMID: 7831953)
J Pediatr Orthop. 1984 Nov;4(6):735-40. (PMID: 6392336)
Injury. 2010 May;41(5):484-7. (PMID: 19800621)
Ultraschall Med. 2019 Aug;40(4):454-464. (PMID: 31195424)
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2000 May-Jun;29(3):325-30. (PMID: 10839581)
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2021 May;9(3):297-305. (PMID: 34239956)
J Child Orthop. 2014 Feb;8(1):3-10. (PMID: 24488847)
J Emerg Med. 2013 Mar;44(3):653-60. (PMID: 23103067)
J Child Orthop. 2020 Aug 01;14(4):273-280. (PMID: 32874359)
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2003 May-Jun;32(3):307-12. (PMID: 12774872)
J Pediatr Orthop. 2009 Jan-Feb;29(1):9-13. (PMID: 19098637)
Pediatr Radiol. 2010 Oct;40(10):1634-9. (PMID: 20544189)
J Am Coll Radiol. 2016 Jul;13(7):819-21. (PMID: 26541458)
J Infus Nurs. 2009 May-Jun;32(3):145-55. (PMID: 19444022)
Cardiol Young. 2013 Aug;23(4):546-52. (PMID: 23040535)
Arch Esp Urol. 2012 Dec;65(10):872-8. (PMID: 23269333)
Med Ultrason. 2013 Dec;15(4):299-303. (PMID: 24286094)
BMC Pediatr. 2021 Oct 13;21(1):450. (PMID: 34641800)
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg (1978). 1980;97(2):117-33. (PMID: 7458597)
ISRN Orthop. 2011 Oct 10;2011:238607. (PMID: 24977057)

Date Created: 20240418 Date Completed: 20240422 Latest Revision: 20240422

20240422

PMC11025947

10.1371/journal.pone.0300753

38635681