Trust as a catalyst: revealing the impact of government trust and professional trust on public health policy compliance during a pandemic.

Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 100968562 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1471-2458 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14712458 NLM ISO Abbreviation: BMC Public Health Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: London : BioMed Central, [2001-

COVID-19*/epidemiology ; COVID-19*/prevention & control ; Trust*; Female ; Humans ; Government ; Guideline Adherence ; Pandemics/prevention & control ; Public Health ; Public Policy ; Male

Background: Existing research has extensively explored the relationship between government trust and compliance behaviour, but significant controversies exist. Some studies suggest a strong positive correlation between the two. Other studies have found that government trust hinders compliance behaviour. However, during the pandemic, the effectiveness of public health policies largely depends on the public's compliance with these policies. To examine the aforementioned controversies, this study utilizes survey data on the Chinese population during the COVID-19 period to explore the relationship between compliance with public health policies and government trust.
Methods: The study conducted a questionnaire survey of 1,395 individuals from 25 provinces in China from mid-November to mid-December 2022. Firstly, we categorized the public's compliance behaviour with public health policies based on the results of factor analysis. Subsequently, we examined the impact of government trust and professional trust on compliance behaviour with public health policies by constructing a structural equation model.
Results: Based on the results of factor analysis, we classified public adherence to public health policies into protective compliance and restrictive compliance. Results from the structural equation model show a positive correlation between the public's trust in the government and both protective and restrictive compliance, with a stronger influence on protective compliance. Government trust also exerts a positive impact on restrictive compliance behaviour through professional trust. Additionally, the study indicates a significant positive correlation between the public's professional trust and restrictive compliance, while it does not significantly affect protective compliance. Moreover, the public from rural areas demonstrates a greater willingness to adhere to both types of public health policies. Married individuals exhibit a stronger inclination toward protective compliance, while females show a stronger tendency toward restrictive compliance.
Conclusion: The study revealed a significant positive impact of government trust and professional trust on compliance behaviour with public health policies during the COVID-19 pandemic, refuting any negative correlation between government trust and compliance behaviour. Normative motivations for compliance behaviour had a substantial impact on adherence. These findings offer valuable insights for future public health crisis management and public policy formulation.
(© 2024. The Author(s).)

Risk Anal. 2022 May;42(5):1073-1085. (PMID: 34601741)
Healthc Anal (N Y). 2022 Nov;2:100064. (PMID: 36644555)
Policy Sci. 2022;55(4):593-630. (PMID: 36405103)
JAMA. 2010 Jan 20;303(3):271-2. (PMID: 20085957)
Br J Health Psychol. 2021 May;26(2):679-696. (PMID: 33763971)
BMC Public Health. 2012 Nov 05;12:947. (PMID: 23127166)
BMC Public Health. 2023 May 25;23(1):951. (PMID: 37231367)
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Jan 26;14:293-302. (PMID: 33542664)
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 30;11:584500. (PMID: 33329241)
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 May 8;6(2):e19161. (PMID: 32369759)
Public Health. 2021 May;194:245-251. (PMID: 33965796)
Eur J Epidemiol. 2020 Aug;35(8):775-779. (PMID: 32785815)
Polit Psychol. 2022 Dec 14;:. (PMID: 36718283)
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Jan;268:113370. (PMID: 32980677)
Eur J Epidemiol. 2011 Mar;26(3):203-10. (PMID: 21476079)
BMC Public Health. 2011 Jul 19;11:575. (PMID: 21771296)
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 04;18(7):. (PMID: 33916631)
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2020 Jul 08;13:753-760. (PMID: 32753988)
BMC Public Health. 2023 Apr 24;23(1):751. (PMID: 37095465)
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Aug 1;11(8):1342-1353. (PMID: 33949815)
J Public Econ. 2020 Dec;192:104316. (PMID: 33162621)
Vaccines (Basel). 2020 Aug 27;8(3):. (PMID: 32867224)
Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 May;19(5):529-536. (PMID: 30928435)
J Environ Manage. 2021 Feb 15;280:111672. (PMID: 33309110)
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Feb 02;9(2):. (PMID: 33540762)
Public Adm Rev. 2020 Sep-Oct;80(5):797-804. (PMID: 32836438)
Am J Public Health. 2009 Oct;99 Suppl 2:S324-32. (PMID: 19797744)
Int J Biol Sci. 2020 Mar 15;16(10):1745-1752. (PMID: 32226294)
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 08;17(18):. (PMID: 32911779)
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2023 Aug;10(4):1576-1587. (PMID: 35679011)
Emerg Infect Dis. 2007 Feb;13(2):290-3. (PMID: 17479894)
Lancet. 2020 Mar 14;395(10227):912-920. (PMID: 32112714)

Keywords: Compliance behaviour; Government trust; Pandemic; Professional trust

Date Created: 20240404 Date Completed: 20240408 Latest Revision: 20240501

20240501

PMC10993454

10.1186/s12889-024-18449-2

38575954